RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect

2005-02-02 09:48:44
Subject: RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect
From: "Liu, David" <david.liu AT eds DOT com>
To: "'nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com'" <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:47:30 -0000

I didn't try 5, but with 50 and 100 no clear difference. I'll try 5 later
then. Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT 
Behalf Of Joe Fernandez
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:37 PM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect

At 09:18 AM 02-02-05 +0000, you wrote:
>Yes, the default was 5, and I do have verbose trace turned on.
>But from the trace file I compare (50 and 100), I cannot see clear
>difference. Maybe I was wrong.
>Thx & rgds,


With the -S,-V,-T  switches on, you should see the values returned by the 
gets in the trace file.
Is this happening at 5, 50 and 100 without any significant differences?

Joe Fernandez
Kardinia Software
jfernand AT kardinia DOT com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>