RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect
Thanks. The original config from our NV was 200 and I changed to 100 and 50
and back to 100. I read somewhere if the network capacity and NV box (CPU)
have no problem we can have it increased.
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT
Behalf Of Joe Fernandez
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 1:56 PM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect
At 08:11 AM 31-01-05 +0000, you wrote:
>There are no files in the ../snmpCollect directory (files with 0 length).
>My NumberConcurrentSnmp is 100 and I made change on number of objects in
>database (from 10000 ro 20000) only.
I believe the default value of NumberConcurrentSnmp is 5, so 100 sounds
ambitious to me.
Did you increment it in steps and monitor the effect?
I would turn it back down, see if data is being collected, then increment
it in steps and check.
Try the -S switch also and look at the configuration information that it
writes to the trace file. This should tell you more about what is happening.
jfernand AT kardinia DOT com