nv-l

Re: [nv-l] NV map question

2004-08-19 09:13:42
Subject: Re: [nv-l] NV map question
From: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:59:07 -0400

You might profitably spend some time examining the X resource files in /usr/OV/app-defaults, particularly OVw.

In this case, you can eliminate the View Area where those icons are kept, and the buttons for the restarting the Navigation Tree and the Tool Bar, by changing the OVw file to say:
        OVw*viewAreaHasScrolled:        False

        OVw*viewAreaHasControl:         False

This will give you that entire window for the map itself.

While you are at it, you might also set
        *displayCopyRightWindow:                False
and get rid of the annoying copyright window that pops up on first start.

I would experiment  with these values by copying the OVw file to your $HOME directory and then doing
        xrdb -merge OVw
to have the X processor merge them into his defaults.   When you are satisfied, then you can copy the file back to /usr/OV/app-defaults for use by everyone.

Hope this helps

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group



alejandro.gabay AT reuters DOT com
Sent by: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com

08/19/2004 11:05 AM
Please respond to
nv-l

To
nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
cc
Subject
[nv-l] NV map question






Hi All,
Is there any way to tell Netview to do not remember the maps seen in the past?.
We a have a map with lots of submaps and the fact that NV puts an icon for every submap visited does not help at all.


B. Regards
Alejandro Gabay




-----------------------------------------------------------------
       Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>