Hello Drew, You can create a fact file
for each of the smaller groups based on the origin slot (IP address) of
the CPQ device, This way when a CPQ trap is forwarded by NetView, the
T/EC can consult the fact file and if the originating server is in the
file then that trap belongs to that group?
Regards,
Ray
Raymond Stoner, IT Specialist
IBM Software Services for Tivoli (ISST)
IBM Software Group - Tivoli Services Americas
1551 South Washington Ave.
Piscataway, NJ 08854
877-851-6190 (tie line 349-2340)
cell 908-472-8185
fax 845-463-5149
"Van Order, Drew \(US
- Hermitage\)" <dvanorder AT deloitte DOT com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
08/05/2004 12:45 PM
|
To
| <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [nv-l] Copying traps--could
use an expert explanation |
|
Hi all,
We are being asked to use NetView for more
than device polling and up/down status. The big push is to save some $$
by using NV to receive traps from servers for HP Insight Manager events,
and possibly expand to other applications that send traps, rather than
using say NetIQ AppManager or MOM. Everything has to become a TEC event,
so this means tying it into TEC_ITS, which we already do with other external
trap sources. I have Compaq traps in, mib2trapped, are receiving test traps
fine.
Here's where trap copying comes in. We send
TEC events to a help desk system based on the event class only, no other
method available at this time. We normally send all Compaq events to one
team, so no problem, that means one event class will do. Now, we will need
to send Compaq events for 98% of servers to one team, but 1% to a second,
and 1% to a third. So, we can copy traps, change the name and TEC event
class, and assign a source file for the small server groups. Since the
trap number itself can't change (or can it) when you copy a trap I think
we will now create 2 TEC events when traps from server group 2 come in--one
in team one, one in team two. This is because the original trap has no
source defined--which is not reasonable in this case because it's hundreds
of servers. And the trap numbers are the same, so TEC_ITS will forward
both, assuming I've added a node to the ruleset based on specific trap
number, rather than a trap settings node.
I hope I explained this decently. I searched
the archives, and haven't seen a post like this. I think it will all become
clear when I understand how the trap coming in is matched to the trap name,
number, etc. Maybe this can't be done, but I have to try because the cost
savings are exceptional and I don't think OpenView can do any better.
Thanks--Drew
Drew Van Order
Deloitte Services LP
Tel: +1 615 882 7836
www.deloitte.com
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected
by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.
Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking
of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
|