nv-l

RE: [nv-l]

2004-05-20 14:37:02
Subject: RE: [nv-l]
From: Brian Kraftchick <Brian.Kraftchick AT odfl DOT com>
To: "'nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com'" <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:25:37 -0400
Thanks for the info.  The main thing with our issue though, is that we don't have any Cisco devices on our network at all.....very weird.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Hampel, Paul E [mailto:paul.hampel AT eds DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:15 PM
To: 'nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com'
Subject: RE: [nv-l]

From what I have seen they are Cisco CDP neighbors that were discovered during a daily configuration poll. I have only seen it on some of the newer device types from Cisco.

Paul E. Hampel
paul.hampel AT eds DOT com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of Brian Kraftchick
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:35 AM
To: NVList (E-mail)
Subject: [nv-l]

NV 7.1.3 on Win2K
 
Could anybody tell me where the 0.0.0.0 interfaces come from in router objects?  I have two core routers that have only ever had 1 or 2 0.0.0.0 interfaces discovered....now they both have about 50.....what could this be coming from ?
 
Brian Kraftchick
Network Administrator
Old Dominion Freight Line
Ph: (336) 822-5938
Fax: (336) 822-5149
Web Site: www.odfl.com
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>