nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [nv-l] lcoation.conf 7.1.4

2004-01-20 14:26:20
Subject: Re: [nv-l] lcoation.conf 7.1.4
From: "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8 AT meadwestvaco DOT com>
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:49:12 -0500

I keep receiving the following error though.


MidWest 0 Site
OH 0 Site MidWest
KY 0 Site MidWest
IN 0 Site MidWest
WV 0 Site MidWest

Dayton 10.x.x.x. Site OH

location.conf[409]: Dayton 10.x.x.x Site OH
   Unknown parent location: 'Dayton', parent entry not defined in a Prior entry

It is treating Dayton like it is the  Parent Submap.   But Dayton is actually the child submap of 'OH'.
Is the location.conf code reading incorrectly?

 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [nv-l] lcoation.conf 7.1.4, Christopher J Petrina
Next by Date:  [nv-l] detail information, Christopher J Petrina
Previous by Thread:  Re: [nv-l] lcoation.conf 7.1.4, Christopher J Petrina
Next by Thread:  Re: [nv-l] lcoation.conf 7.1.4, Mario Behring
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]