Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery

nv-l

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery

2004-01-16 13:55:37

Subject:	Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery
From:	"Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8 AT meadwestvaco DOT com>
To:	nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:46:51 -0500

I am currently showing exactly what you described I see the Management vlan IP and not necessarily the ports that are connected to the edge switches. Sot his is working fine. Now will Switch Analyzer discover the switch ports? or simply report on their status?

Would best practice then be to use a $ in front of the switch devices in the discovery file? Sot hat they are snmp polled not pinged?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery, Christopher J Petrina Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery, Jane Curry Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery, Leslie Clark Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery, Christopher J Petrina <=

Previous by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage)
Next by Date:	[nv-l] creating maps with multiple maps open, Christopher J Petrina
Previous by Thread:	Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery, Leslie Clark
Next by Thread:	[nv-l] Recall: help, Bursik, Scott {PBSG}
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]