nv-l

RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView

2004-01-12 10:34:49
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView
From: CMazon AT commercebankfl DOT com
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:30:40 -0500

We have several 2500 series routers and I also resolved the issue by increasing the retry and the retry intervals.

Carlos Mazon


"Seminara, Sandro" <SSeminara AT fnis DOT com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com

01/12/2004 01:32 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
        To:        "'nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com'" <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
        cc:        
        Subject:        RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView



I experienced the same problem about 2 years ago before we replaced our 2500 series routers.  We had approx. 700 2500 series routers of various flavors deployed though out our WAN.  Many of these devices were running out of memory during demand polls etc.  In order combat our polling issues, the only thing we could do was increase the retry and lower the timeout values.

Thank you
Sandro Seminara

Fidelity National Financial

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan E. Hennis [
mailto:Hennis_Alan_E AT cat DOT com]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:03 PM

To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com

Subject: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView

NV 7.1.3 FP 1 RH Linux 7.2

I have a lot of old Cisco 25xx routers in my network. There are plans to
replace these older devices this year but not until much later in the year.

I poll all of my routers via SNMP.  I see a lot of missed SNMP queries of

these routers. This causes NetView to report the router down when it is in

fact still reachable.  I was wondering if anyone on the list has

experienced this of has any suggestions on how to better monitor older

Cisco routers.

Thanks
Alan E. Hennis

Caterpillar Inc

Systems+Process Division

309.494.3308

hennis_alan_e AT cat DOT com