nv-l

[nv-l] Netview on Linux question

2003-10-30 10:55:24
Subject: [nv-l] Netview on Linux question
From: "Pritesh Jewan" <Pritesh AT aptronics.co DOT za>
To: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:37:57 +0200

Hi List,

I have not yet received my copy of NetView V7.1.4 on Linux and would just like to find out from the forum, does NV V7.1.4 on Linux support data warehouse for snmp collect data or is this functionality only available on Netview Windows and AIX/Solaris?

Also, does anyone know if it is possible to get config data(topology and object database) into data warehouse? I know in AIX/sol Netview has the ability through RIM and Netview NT can only store it in MSSQL. But is there any way to get topology and object info in a database on Netview Linux?

Thanks for any help

Regards

Pritesh

Pritesh Jewan
Aptronics (Pty) Ltd
Tel   : +27 (0) 11 577 0800
Fax  : +27 (0) 11 326 4921
Cell : +27 (0) 84-677-2486

pritesh AT aptronics.co DOT za

*** Aptronics…Has Moved !

Please take note of new address and contact details.

 

Physical Address :          

Aptronics House, 288 Main avenue                 

Cnr. Main and Harley        

Ferndale, 2194

 

Postal Address:

P.O. Box 2732, Randburg, 2125

 

Telephone : (011) 577-0800

Facsimile : (011) 326-4921

 

 

Legal Disclaimer: This E-mail, it's attachment/s and the information that it contains is/are confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access to this E-mail, it's attachment/s, and the information it contains is/are for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this Email , do not read, disclose, disseminate or use the information in any way.

 

Any views in this communication are those of the sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Aptronics (PTY) Ltd. Aptronics (PTY) Ltd and the sender does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of errors or virus nor does it guarantee that it has not been intercepted or interfered with en-route.

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>