Don,
Thanks
for that - it was kick I needed to start thinking again. Netview wasn't
seeing the networks as related since there was no gateway between
them.
What I
thought I'd done was setup a test router on my w2k server, although actually I'd
only setup the two interfaces. What I expected to see (which is what
I'd seen before) was the node connecting the two networks. Of course I
hadn't done that, I've just configured the router on my server now, demand poll
& it's appearing as I wanted since netview sees it as a gateway which it
wasn't before - duh!
Thanks
again
Karl
Karl,
It's
all perspective.
From
the 192.168.1 subnet perspective, the node is OK - working just fine on this
subnet
Form
the 10.253 subnet perspective, the node is Critical - Dead on this
subnet
From
the Internet perspective, the "router" is marginal.
Don
Davis
Hi,
Maybe I'm
loosing it/too late, but I'm seeing something simple/weird I can't
explain....
Using RedHat
7.2, nv 7.1.3 fp1
I've got a node
(w2k) with two interfaces (one real 192.168.1 and one a loopback adapter
10.253 with static ipaddr).
The status
propagation doesn't seem right to me;
Internet
(yellow)
->192.168.1
(green)
-->>
Segment1 (green)
--->>>
MyNode (green)
---->>>> 10.253.1.50
(red)
---->>>> 192.168.1.10
(green)
->10.253
(red)
-->>
Segment1 (red)
--->>>
MyNode (red)
---->>>> 10.253.1.50
(red)
---->>>> 192.168.1.10
(green)
The map is the
default and is set (unchanged) to default
propogation.
The status of MyNode seems
wrong under both networks - shouldn't it show marginal since only one
interface is down?
The status of
the two networks also seems wrong - shouldn't they both be marginal too -
they would be cascading the severity up?
The root
Internet seems right - at least one contained object is down so it is
marginal.
Anyone got any
views - I've just been doing this with multiple nested submaps on AIX and I
know it worked ok - I've got screenshot to prove it (that being the
only way to stave off madness I reckon...). I'm sure I didn't change
any status propogation there....
Thanks in
advance
Karl
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
electronic mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the electronic mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this electronic mail in error and that any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this electronic mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return
mail.
==============================================================================
