nv-l

RE: [nv-l] Token-Ring Management

2002-04-23 13:40:05
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Token-Ring Management
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>
To: "IBM NetView Discussion (E-mail)" <nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:40:05 -0500
Don - we are in the same soup.
 
LNM if it is available, can't possibly be very useful at this stage of the game due to OS/2 being the platform
 
In our case, our rings are now VLAN'd into our core switch network so LNM would REALLY be of no value.
 
The best we do is use our Cisco probes on these rings.
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Donald [mailto:donald.davis AT firstcitizens DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:11 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion (E-mail)
Subject: [nv-l] Token-Ring Management

To all,
How are you managing your Token-Ring environments?
Is IBM's Lan Network Manager for OS/2 still the only/best solution?
I have Cabletron MSAUs and customer no service from Cabletron.
What ever happened to Sallie Matlack? (Queen of token-ring)
Is there a solution that integrates with NetView? (since Nways is dead)
This is in a mission critical environment (connecting to a mainframe) that cannot be easily changed to another technology.

Thanks,
Don
=======================
Donald Davis
First Citizens Bank
Systems Engineer Consultant
Enterprise Management
100 East Tryon Road
Mail Code: DAC 22
Raleigh, NC.  27603-3526
919-716-8448

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the electronic mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this electronic mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return mail.

==============================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>