Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview
2001-10-23 14:09:41
"Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com> writes:
> Todd,
>
> You mentioned that you are taking NV events, forwarding those to TEC...then
> getting automatic tickets. The problem with long names is the space
> taken in the one line problem descriptions.
>
> NV --> TEC is a built-in adapter
> TEC --> ticket is probably a script called by a TEC ruleset
>
> Why not just update that script to remove the domain name from the right
> slot value before it forwards the information to the ticketing system?
> This leaves NV alone and adds no workload to TEC.
This does sound like the best solution...now to sell it to the TEC
guys. :-) As in many larger environments, a different group handles
TEC rules and ticketing. Their requirement for NV events currently
requests a hostname only be sent, but it seems that doing so has a
variety of drawbacks that undermine the TEC-Netview integration.
Thanks all for the illumination--I think I can sell a change of that
"event standard" or at least open the discussion based on what's been
discussed in this thread.
--
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, (continued)
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Leslie Clark
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Todd H.
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Jane Curry
- RE: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Barr, Scott
- RE: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, James Shanks
- RE: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Barr, Scott
- RE: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Leslie Clark
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Todd H.
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Leslie Clark
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview, Stephen Hochstetler
- Re: dns/host/win2k dns and netview,
Todd H. <=
|
|
|