Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?
2001-10-18 14:53:55
"Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com> writes:
> You can easily run multiple rulesets.
>
> You can create a very small ruleset using Leslie's great idea and activate
> it using the "TEC Adapter".
This sounds appealing...but how does this "small ruleset" get the
output from the multiple other rulesets? Or is there some
functionality of the ruleset editor that I'm missing?
All I'm aware of it the File>Import function in the ruleste editor
that place a copy of a ruleset into an existing one...resulting in a
rather large ruleset.
> You can create additional rulesets and activate all of them (multiple) in
> the /usr/OV/conf/ESE.automation file. This should let you group rules
> within a ruleset so that you can manage them easier.
--
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Todd H.
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Jane Curry
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Todd H.
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, James Shanks
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Stephen Hochstetler
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Todd H.
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?,
Todd H. <=
- RE: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Barr, Scott
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Stephen Hochstetler
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, James Shanks
- Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?, Jane Curry
|
|
|