nv-l

Re: AW: AW: cisco - router/switch configs and syslogs

2001-06-12 12:15:10
Subject: Re: AW: AW: cisco - router/switch configs and syslogs
From: netview AT toddh DOT net (Todd H.)
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: 12 Jun 2001 11:15:10 -0500
[quoting corrected]

FITZINGER Richard <richard.fitzinger AT it-austria DOT com> writes:
>[Todd wrote:]
>> FITZINGER Richard <richard.fitzinger AT it-austria DOT com> writes:
>> > if your demand is...
>> > 1. to save configs automatically whenever running configs change,
>> > 2. to set up syslog reports that point out specific information from all
>> the
>> > syslogs,
>> > 3. to spend a little more money for managing your network...
>> > ... you should dump your NT installation and set up CW2000 on a
>> > solaris box (with enough memory). that should  work (at least for
>> > 1. and 2.) 
>> 
>> 
>> I'm curious about this bit.  What's superior about the Solaris
>> version?  Doesn't the NT version have the same functionality? 
>
> sorry for the small emotional bit. but we are struggling with a large
> heterogenous network and I have seen a couple of tools (Ciscoworks,
> Optivity...) doing fine on UNIX and doing not sooooo fine on NT - what
> mainly depends on the OS, not on the tool, I guess. I think where are no
> major functionality differences between Ciscoworks' UNIX and NT versions.
> 
> what's superior? the stability of UNIX platforms - at least at our
> site ;-)

You'll get no argument from me for relative OS stability.   I was just
making sure there wasn't a feature difference between the two. 

-- 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>