nv-l

RE: ovwdb tracing.

2001-05-11 09:31:19
Subject: RE: ovwdb tracing.
From: BAUDOUX BERNARD <bernard.baudoux AT fortisbank DOT com>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 15:31:19 +0200
Jane,

Yes, the size is big enough (at least 50% higher than the output of
'ovobjprint -S'

Regards,
Bernard Baudoux
Phone: +32 (0)2/565.24.68
e-mail : bernard.baudoux AT fortisbank DOT com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jane Curry [SMTP:jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk]
> Sent: Friday, 11 May, 2001 15:07
> To:   IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject:      Re: [NV-L] ovwdb tracing.
> 
> Bernard,
> Have you checked the size of your ovwdb cache parameter.  Best practice
> says it should be abot 50% bigger than your object database (ovobjprint
> -S).  If your cache is smaller than your database, ovwdb will probably
> spend lots of time thrashing around.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jane
> 
> --
> Tivoli Certified Enterprise Consultant & Instructor
> Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
> Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
> Copyright (c) 2001 Jane Curry <jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk>.  All 
> rights
> reserved.
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l

This email and any attached files are confidential and may be legally 
privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, 
copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication 
is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete this email.
Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or 
incomplete, or contain viruses.  
The sender therefore is in no way liable for any errors or omissions in the 
content of this message, which may arise as a result of email transmission. 
If verification is required, please request a hard copy.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>