James,

     thankyou very much. I'll claim my upgrade right now.

Regards,
Juan.

Juan Echevarría López
AT&T Global Network Services
Internet: jechevarria AT att DOT com


James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM on 13/12/2000 19:58:06

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>

To:   IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: [NV-L] snmp proxies in v6r0




You need to get off 6.0 and install 6.0.1.
No customer should remain at 6.0 if he has any problems at all.

James Shanks
Team Leader, Level 3 Support
 Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT



echevarria AT ES.IBM DOT [email protected] on 12/13/2000 10:33:29 AM

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>

Sent by:  owner-nv-l AT tkg DOT com


To:   nv-l AT tkg DOT com
cc:   paqui_martinez AT ES.IBM DOT COM
Subject:  [NV-L] snmp proxies in v6r0





Hello everybody,

     I never had any SNMP proxy in my Netview. I have just upgraded one of
my Netviews for Unix (AIX 4.2.1) from v5r1 to v6r0 and I have found out
that some of my routers now appear in the xnmsnmpconf window as proxied by
themselves!! so they appear now twice: first time with its IP address, with
right community name and without proxy; second with its hostname, with
community public and proxied by its hostname. I guess this has to do with
the new SNMP polling, but I'm not sure if all my snmp polled nodes appear
in the list or just some of them.
     Is that behaviour right? Can anybody tell me something else on that?

Many thanks in advance,
Juan.

Juan Echevarría López
AT&T Global Network Services
Internet: jechevarria AT att DOT com   |   echevarria AT es.ibm DOT com


_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l


_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l