I can't comment on Reflection but Exceed and NetView do work fairly well
together. There are always going to be certain incompatabilities though and
obviously recommendation to help them better work together. For example,
Exceed on NT runs much better when the box has adequate memory installed
(minimum 128MB). Also, DO NOT close the exceed session by using the small
"X" box at the top right of the NT window as this does not correctly close
down the X-windows client sessions on the NetView Server and you will end
up with rogue processes on the NetView Server box which will end up
consuming large amounts of CPU if not 100% of it.

There have been other issues where Exceed and NetView have been used
together. Have you considered using the Web Client in Version 6 of NetView
as an alternative ?

Gareth Holl
Software Engineer
gholl AT tivoli DOT com

Tivoli Systems / IBM Corporation
Research Triangle Park,  NC  27703.    1-800-TIVOLI-8


"Gruner Mike" <mike.gruner AT rfv.sfa DOT se> on 12/05/2000 05:14:00 AM

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>

To:   nv-l AT tkg DOT com
cc:    (bcc: Gareth Holl/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:  [NV-L] Question regarding Reflection vs. Exceed X-sessi ons




We are using Relection for our NetView X-session and have discovered
problem
with sessions not responding eg. ping and demand-poll.
When the NetView Gui is taken down and started up again sessions work ok
again.
Has anyone had the same experience with Reflection
or is everything ok when you run for instamce Exceed ?

Mike Gruner , RFV Data
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l