nv-l

Re: map cares on ip but ignores snmp

2000-11-16 10:33:50
Subject: Re: map cares on ip but ignores snmp
From: Jeff Fitzwater <jfitz AT Princeton DOT EDU>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:33:50 -0500
If the 192.168.1.2 router is the only router connected to your Netview net
192.168.1.0 then I would make sure that there is a default route defined in
the netview box pointing to 192.168.1.2 so it caqn find the 212.132.50.0 net.

If on unix do the following...
netstat -rn
Look for a route 0.0.0.0 or the word "default"  it should be pointing to the
192.168.1.2 router.
if there is a default but pointing to the wrong place and you want to leave
it in, add a route as follows... (must be root)
route add 212.132.50.0 192.168.1.2   1
This tells Netview how to reach that net which is 1 hop away.

On windows or NT I believe you can use the MSDOS window and the syntax is
simmilar.

Jeff fitzwater
CIT Systems & Networking
Princeton University


michael.hamm AT tudor DOT lu wrote:

> i am running two LANs, connected true 2 routers
> by each other. To connect the routers, I have to
> use the transfer - network 212.132.50.0 (dont ask me why)
>
> so it looks something like this:
>
> NV-BOX (Local Net 1)
>        ¦ (192.168.1.1)
>        ¦
>        ¦
>        ¦ (192.168.1.2)
> Router
>        ¦ (212.132.50.1)
>        ¦
>        ¦ (transfer - network)
>        ¦
>        ¦ (212.132.50.2)
> Router
>        ¦ (172.23.20.1)
>        ¦
>        ¦
> (Local Net 2)
>
> NetView has no chance, to reach the 2 cards 50.1 and 50.2 over IP
> and it is absolutly forbitten to me to set the route localy.
>
> So the MAP applikation of NetView give a red label to the
> interface-symbols.
>
> I enabe SNMP on the router, but the MAP - Applikation was
> not smart enought to check the SNMP-Value of the interfaces
> and indicate them green.
> They are still red, thats sad.
>
> Is there a solution???
> Michael
>
> _________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>