Leslie,
I upgraded my linux environment, particularly the video card, and am not
having any of those nasty display problems anymore (I hope).
My recent problem was due to me sending "Input 2" into a "Resolve on Match"
twice instead of "Input 1" and "Input 2". It was a typo and a conceptual
error. The sad part is that the GUI never complained on save or exit. It
just refused to take the change?
It's working now. Thanks.
--
~~~~~~~~
Ray Foss
_________________________________________
mailto:Ray.Foss AT motorola DOT com
Office: 480-441-1093 Mobile: 602-721-4792
Pager: 800-759-8352 PIN: 1244994
FAX: 480-441-5455
Motorola, Inc.
Global Computing & Telecommunications
8111 East McDowell Road - AZ33-H1780
Scottsdale, Arizona 85257 USA
_________________________________________
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lclark AT us.ibm DOT com [mailto:lclark AT us.ibm DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, 07 September 2000 19:54
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Cc: Ray.Foss
> Subject: Re: Rulesets (was Re: [NV-L] RE: NV-L Digest - 05 Sep 2000)
>
> And Ray, I don't trust that Linux emulator you are using,
> either. Remember
> how the titlebar did not always match the ruleset you were editing?
>
> Cordially,
>
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> Detroit
>
> To: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>
> cc:
> Subject: Rulesets (was Re: [NV-L] RE: NV-L Digest - 05 Sep 2000)
>
> Ray -
> You've got me. If you are root when you run the ruleset
> editor, then your
> changes should be saved. If you are not root when you start
> the editor, it
> should pop up a message saying that you don't have update authority to
> /usr/OV/conf/rulesets.
>
> Next time, cd to that directory in another open window while
> you run the
> editor
> and do a File --> Save before you exit.
> The rulesets owned by bin:bin are the ones we shipped -- all our
> executables are
> originally owned by bin:bin. Once you change them, they
> should be owned by
> root.
> Do you see this happening or not?
>
> Also, the .BAK files are backup copies of the rulesets you
> edit. They are
> created when you open a ruleset for editing in case you
> change your mind
> and
> cancel all your changes. So if you ever want to go back to a previous
> version
> even after you have saved a new one, it is still there in the
> .BAK file and
> you
> can just rename it. When you open a ruleset for editing, in
> addition to
> the
> .BAK copy being made or replaced, a temp copy called
> <rulesetname>.<random_suffix> will b created. This will
> change as you add
> new
> parts to your open ruleset and use "Save". When you exit using the
> pull-down,
> the temp copy replaces the open copy, which is then deleted.
> If you keep a
> window open while you edit, you should be able to see and
> verify that all
> of
> this happens.
>
> James Shanks
> Team Leader, Level 3 Support
> Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
> To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>
> cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
> Subject: [NV-L] RE: NV-L Digest - 05 Sep 2000
> Thanks to Michael Seibold and James Shanks for the suggestions to my
> RESOLVE
> and FORWARD issue from last week. I think I now know enough to try to
> implement the ideas.
>
> I'm now running into a problem where NONE of my ruleset
> editor changes seem
> to be taking effect. I make my changes, save the ruleset and
> when I go
> back
> into the same ruleset, they are lost!
>
> I do some extra files created in /usr/OV/conf/rulesets such
> as: x.rs.BAK
> and
> x.rsixMQab where "x" is the ruleset name I am trying to
> modify. They are
> owned by root:bin. The other rulesets seem to be owned by bin:bin.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
|
