Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility
1999-12-11 09:43:06
Is Netview AT Tivoli DOT com the right address to send such flames to?
--D
Duane Waddle
waddle1 AT us.ibm DOT com
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..." -- RFC1925
James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> on 12/10/99
10:57:56 PM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
Sent by: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
<NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility
Ken -
Sending an enhancement request and complaining bitterly about what you
perceive
as a loss of function is exactly what I think you should do, else your
complaints may not reach the right ears.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Ken Karasek
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, James Shanks
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility,
Duane Waddle <=
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Jane Curry
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Ken Karasek
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Ken Karasek
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Ken Karasek
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Michael Pearson
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Ken Karasek
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Buchwalter, Judah
- Re: NetView 5.1.2 Ping Utility, Jane Curry
|
|
|