nv-l

Re: NT machines with SNMP

1999-11-16 03:48:23
Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
From: "Nochta, Zoltan" <nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 09:48:23 +0100
Hello,
The MS section in the oid_to_type file looks like:

1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT: # Microsoft Windows
NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft
Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft
Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.3:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft
Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.4:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft
Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows 95: # Microsoft Windows
95 Agent

Some PCs have the 2nd entry and some other NT machines the 3rd.
Do you think I need to edit this?

                        Thanks for help, Zoltan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frantsen Christian [mailto:cf AT INTERNOC DOT SE]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:26 PM
> To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
>
>
> I have noticed that there are several different ID's for NT
> machines, I have
> added at least 4 i think.
> So I suggest you take a look at the oid_to_* files.
>
> /Christian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nochta, Zoltan [mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:02 PM
> To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU <mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
>
>
>
> Hi,
> this ID is to define the vendor and the class of the object I think.
> Microsoft is present in this file and as I wrote, there are
> some PCs with
> full-infos (MIBs) to netview. I think it should be machine-dependent.
>
> Any other ideas are welcome!
>
>                                 Zoltan
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boyles, Gary P [ mailto:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM
> <mailto:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM> ]
> > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 4:44 PM
> > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU <mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
> > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
> >
> >
> > Zoltan,
> > Make sure the sysObjectID for the PCs is known by NetView.
> Do this by
> > checking for the OID in your \usr\OV\conf\oid_to_typ and
> > \usr\OV\conf\C\oid_to_sym.
> > files.
> >
> > Garys
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nochta, Zoltan [ mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE
> <mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE> ]
> > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 7:06 AM
> > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> > Subject: NT machines with SNMP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                         Hi Forumers,
> >
> >         I'm running Netview on NT.
> >         There are a lot of NT Workstations and servers
> > running SNMP-Service
> > in the network.
> >         Some of them are manageble with Netview (I can read the MIB
> > Variables), but more than 50% is only visible (as unknown
> PC) for our
> > favourite networkmanagement-system. Has somebody any idea, how to
> > prevent/repair it?
> >
> >         The SNMP-configuration of the PCs is the same.
> >
> >                         Thanks, Zoltan
> >
>

Hello,
The MS section in the oid_to_type file looks like:

1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.3:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.4:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows 95: # Microsoft Windows 95 Agent

Some PCs have the 2nd entry and some other NT machines the 3rd.
Do you think I need to edit this?

                        Thanks for help, Zoltan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frantsen Christian [mailto:cf AT INTERNOC DOT SE]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:26 PM
> To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
>
>
> I have noticed that there are several different ID's for NT
> machines, I have
> added at least 4 i think.
> So I suggest you take a look at the oid_to_* files.
>
> /Christian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nochta, Zoltan [mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:02 PM
> To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU <mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
>
>
>
> Hi,
> this ID is to define the vendor and the class of the object I think.
> Microsoft is present in this file and as I wrote, there are
> some PCs with
> full-infos (MIBs) to netview. I think it should be machine-dependent.
>
> Any other ideas are welcome!
>
>                                 Zoltan
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boyles, Gary P [ mailto:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM
> <mailto:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM> ]
> > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 4:44 PM
> > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU <mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
> > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP
> >
> >
> > Zoltan,
> > Make sure the sysObjectID for the PCs is known by NetView. 
> Do this by
> > checking for the OID in your \usr\OV\conf\oid_to_typ and
> > \usr\OV\conf\C\oid_to_sym.
> > files.
> >
> > Garys
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nochta, Zoltan [ mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE
> <mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE> ]
> > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 7:06 AM
> > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> > Subject: NT machines with SNMP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                         Hi Forumers,
> >
> >         I'm running Netview on NT.
> >         There are a lot of NT Workstations and servers
> > running SNMP-Service
> > in the network.
> >         Some of them are manageble with Netview (I can read the MIB
> > Variables), but more than 50% is only visible (as unknown
> PC) for our
> > favourite networkmanagement-system. Has somebody any idea, how to
> > prevent/repair it?
> >
> >         The SNMP-configuration of the PCs is the same.
> >
> >                         Thanks, Zoltan
> >
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>