nv-l [Top] [All Lists]

## Re: NT machines with SNMP

1999-11-16 03:48:23
 Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP "Nochta, Zoltan" nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com Tue, 16 Nov 1999 09:48:23 +0100
 ```Hello, The MS section in the oid_to_type file looks like: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.3:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.4:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows 95: # Microsoft Windows 95 Agent Some PCs have the 2nd entry and some other NT machines the 3rd. Do you think I need to edit this? Thanks for help, Zoltan > -----Original Message----- > From: Frantsen Christian [mailto:cf AT INTERNOC DOT SE] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:26 PM > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP > > > I have noticed that there are several different ID's for NT > machines, I have > added at least 4 i think. > So I suggest you take a look at the oid_to_* files. > > /Christian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nochta, Zoltan [mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:02 PM > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP > > > > Hi, > this ID is to define the vendor and the class of the object I think. > Microsoft is present in this file and as I wrote, there are > some PCs with > full-infos (MIBs) to netview. I think it should be machine-dependent. > > Any other ideas are welcome! > > Zoltan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Boyles, Gary P [ mailto:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM > ] > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 4:44 PM > > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP > > > > > > Zoltan, > > Make sure the sysObjectID for the PCs is known by NetView. > Do this by > > checking for the OID in your \usr\OV\conf\oid_to_typ and > > \usr\OV\conf\C\oid_to_sym. > > files. > > > > Garys > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nochta, Zoltan [ mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE > ] > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 7:06 AM > > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > > Subject: NT machines with SNMP > > > > > > > > > > Hi Forumers, > > > > I'm running Netview on NT. > > There are a lot of NT Workstations and servers > > running SNMP-Service > > in the network. > > Some of them are manageble with Netview (I can read the MIB > > Variables), but more than 50% is only visible (as unknown > PC) for our > > favourite networkmanagement-system. Has somebody any idea, how to > > prevent/repair it? > > > > The SNMP-configuration of the PCs is the same. > > > > Thanks, Zoltan > > > ``` Hello, The MS section in the oid_to_type file looks like: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.1:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.3:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.4:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows NT 4.0: # Microsoft Windows NT Agent 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.2:Microsoft:Microsoft Windows 95: # Microsoft Windows 95 Agent Some PCs have the 2nd entry and some other NT machines the 3rd. Do you think I need to edit this?                         Thanks for help, Zoltan > -----Original Message----- > From: Frantsen Christian [mailto:cf AT INTERNOC DOT SE] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:26 PM > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP > > > I have noticed that there are several different ID's for NT > machines, I have > added at least 4 i think. > So I suggest you take a look at the oid_to_* files. > > /Christian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nochta, Zoltan [mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 5:02 PM > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP > > > > Hi, > this ID is to define the vendor and the class of the object I think. > Microsoft is present in this file and as I wrote, there are > some PCs with > full-infos (MIBs) to netview. I think it should be machine-dependent. > > Any other ideas are welcome! > >                                 Zoltan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Boyles, Gary P [ mailto:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM > ] > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 4:44 PM > > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > > Subject: Re: NT machines with SNMP > > > > > > Zoltan, > > Make sure the sysObjectID for the PCs is known by NetView.  > Do this by > > checking for the OID in your \usr\OV\conf\oid_to_typ and > > \usr\OV\conf\C\oid_to_sym. > > files. > > > > Garys > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nochta, Zoltan [ mailto:nochta AT COOPERATION-MANAGEMENT DOT DE > ] > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 7:06 AM > > To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU > > Subject: NT machines with SNMP > > > > > > > > > >                         Hi Forumers, > > > >         I'm running Netview on NT. > >         There are a lot of NT Workstations and servers > > running SNMP-Service > > in the network. > >         Some of them are manageble with Netview (I can read the MIB > > Variables), but more than 50% is only visible (as unknown > PC) for our > > favourite networkmanagement-system. Has somebody any idea, how to > > prevent/repair it? > > > >         The SNMP-configuration of the PCs is the same. > > > >                         Thanks, Zoltan > > >
 Current Thread NT machines with SNMP, Nochta, Zoltan Re: NT machines with SNMP, Boyles, Gary P Re: NT machines with SNMP, Nochta, Zoltan Re: NT machines with SNMP, Frantsen Christian Re: NT machines with SNMP, Nochta, Zoltan <= Re: NT machines with SNMP, Boyles, Gary P Re: NT machines with SNMP, Matthew Moore (DSL AK)