nv-l

Re: Loading MIB's NetView5.1 on NT

1999-11-08 11:24:21
Subject: Re: Loading MIB's NetView5.1 on NT
From: "Rauwers, Laurens" <rauwers AT HITT DOT NL>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 17:24:21 +0100
Leslie,
it(the 99%) is related to the the problem, because it never stops.
I had to stop it with stop Process in the NT Process Monitor.
Cordially
Laurens Rauwers
rauwers AT hitt DOT nl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leslie Clark [SMTP:lclark AT US.IBM DOT COM]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 4:46 PM
> To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: Loading MIB's NetView5.1 on NT
>
> If the problem is the '|' (pipe, shorthand 'or') in a size description
> field,
> then the workaround is to edit the mib file and replace the pipe with
> a comma, since Netview does not pay any attention to the size field.
> This is APAR IY05289, at least on Unix. Not sure about NT.
>
> It is normal for the mib loader to use all available resources when
> loading. The bigger the file, the harder it works. So that may be
> unrelated to the problem.
>
> Cordially,
>
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
>
>
> Hello,
> The reason for the trouble is the last specified item in this MIB, this
> item
> contains a SMI version 2 field(MAX-ACCESS).
> Specified in the header of the MIB is:  FROM RFC1155-SMI;
> which is vers. 1.? or so.
> So in fact it is a MIB problem.
> I think that NV's reaction (99% CPU load) is not correct.
> Laurens Rauwers
> rauwers AT hitt DOT nl
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Cowan [SMTP:chris.cowan AT 2ND-WAVE DOT COM]
> > Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 4:29 PM
> > To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> > Subject:      Re: Loading MIB's NetView5.1 on NT
> >
> > "Rauwers, Laurens" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to load the HP JetDirect MIB(big one, more than 200kB), but
> > the
> > > MIB loader comes in an infinite loop
> > > and consumes about 99% CPU time.
> > > The MIB contains the "|" sign in some description fields.(see APAR
> > IY05289).
> > > Is this the reason of the problem, or has anyone a better idea?
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Laurens Rauwers
> > > rauwers AT hitt DOT nl
> >
> > I ran into a similar problem with the HA MIB on NV 5.1 for UNIX.    I
> > upgraded to 5.1.1 and still had problems.
> >
> > Finally, I reset the MIB database, and loaded the HA MIB on the default
> > MIB DB, and everything went fine.
> >
> > I'd back up my MIB DB and give this a try. << File: Card for Chris Cowan
> > >>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>