nv-l

Re: Routers topology tree

1999-05-07 15:27:58
Subject: Re: Routers topology tree
From: Sergio Cardona F <sergcafe AT MAIL.VISIONTECH.COM DOT CO>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 14:27:58 -0500
Hi Connie:

There are Cisco and IBM.

Thanks,

Sergio Cardona.

Connie Logg wrote:
>
> What kind of routers?  If they are cisco you can read out the cdp
> information and it will tell you who is connected to who on what port.
>
> I don't know about other vendors.
>
> At 12:08 PM 5/7/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hello All:
> >
> >I would like you help me with this:
> >
> >I need to extract the routers topology tree, I have thought to make an
> >script that uses traceroute to obtain the tree, but I wonder if there is
> >any way to obtain the tree from the Netview (The Netview know the
> >topology).
> >
> >I have Netview 5.1 with aix 4.21.
> >
> >I made an example, supose that we have this topology :
> >
> >N----A----B----C-Lc-Sc
> >     |    |----D-Ld-Sd
> >     |
> >     |----E----F-Lf-Sf
> >     |    |-Le-Se
> >     |
> >     G-Lg-Sg
> >
> >Where A,B,C,D,E,F are routers; Sx = Server x; Lx = Lan x; and N =
> >Netview.
> >
> >I like to obtain the topology tree in this way:
> >
> >>From A depends: B,E,G
> >>From B depends: C,D
> >>From C depends: Sc
> >>From D depends: Sd
> >>From E depends: F,Se
> >>From F depends: Sf
> >>From G depends: Sg
> >
> >Any idea will be apprecited.
> >
> >
> >Thanks and regards,
> >
> >Sergio Cardona.
> >
> *********************************************************************
> " Of course the opinions expressed here are my own. "
>
> Connie Logg    CAL AT SLAC.Stanford DOT Edu  ph: 650-926-2879
> Network Management and Performance Analyst
> SLAC (MS 97), P.O. Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309
>
> "Happiness is found along the way, not at the end of the road."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>