nv-l

Antwort: Administrativly Down

1999-05-07 04:18:13
Subject: Antwort: Administrativly Down
From: Margit Holzwarth <Margit.Holzwarth AT RWSO DOT DE>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 09:18:13 +0100
Hallo Roger,
we have the same problem for some of our router interfaces (Cisco routers)
with NetView 5.1.1. I think these interfaces were administratively down
some time ago and are not corrected by a demand poll, although they are up
in the meantime and working correctly. The MIB-variable ifAdminStatus is
up, so NetView should know that these interfaces are not administratively
down.
I have called support, but since now no reaction.

Margit




 (Embedded
 image moved   Roger Campagnoni
 to file:      <Roger_Campagnoni AT COUNTRYWIDE DOT COM>
 PIC05200.PCX) 06.05.99 19:30




Bitte antworten an Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

An:     NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
Kopie:   (Blindkopie: Margit Holzwarth/RWSO/DE)
Thema:  Administrativly Down




I have been experiencing some problems with NetView 5.0 for AIX polling our
routers.  The problem is NetView for some reason or another has placed some
of the routers interfaces in a administratively down condition.  No matter
how may demand polls I do NetView will skip the interface due to an
administratively down condition, even deleting the router and allowing
NetView to rediscover the device, the Administratively down condition
remains.
The interfaces NetView sees as "AD" I cannot detect anything wrong with
them.  They are up and operating properly (at least according to the
router)
My question is:
Is there any way to force NetView to re-verify/discover the "AD"
interfaces?
Thanks

Attachment: PIC05200.PCX
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>