I started to answer this question twice yesterday, but decided that it is a
very big subject and
not enough information. Can you tell us more about what you are thinking?
How is your network
logically arranged? Most people use location icons to hold many routers and
the networks
that connect them, and maybe leave a network between them to show the
connection. How many
routers are on the top map now? How many do you expect to find in the end?


Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager


---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM on 03-18-99
09:13 PM ---------------------------


Carlo Manuali <carlo AT UNIPG DOT IT> on 03-18-99 05:55:41 AM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM)
Subject:  IP MAPs of a NETWORK





Hi,
I re-send this message because I haven't reply.
The phase of automatic discovery match the first set of routers.
My idea is define a submaps for each interface that I see.
is it a good way?
How I can for multiple submaps other?
Can the MLM help me?

p.s. I have a collection of object (submaps, routers,..) but I would the
relative
IP MAP too.

Regards,


Carlo Manuali
University of Perugia (C.A.S.I.)