nv-l

Re: Perl vs shell scripts

1999-03-16 11:44:50
Subject: Re: Perl vs shell scripts
From: "Boyles, Gary P" <gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 08:44:50 -0800
Alain,
I used to do "C" and "C-shell" programming.  I've traded in
the "C-shell" for perl.  I like it a lot.  It's kind of a cross
between, C, Basic, and Shell programming.  Takes the best of
all worlds, and a lot of people have written modules for it.

On NT, I use the "ActiveState" version of perl.  It seems to
activate and run faster than the version on AIX, but its hard
to compare  (Pentium Pro 200 (vs) IBM RS6000 560).

The nice thing about it... is that it is completely portable
between AIX and NT  (except for the slash (vs) back-slash
in file-names).

Look at http://language.perl.com/index.html  for the
distribution pointers.

Regards,

Gary Boyles


-----Original Message-----
From: MENEZES, ALAIN [mailto:a.menezes AT ASLK-CGER DOT BE]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 1999 7:47 AM
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
Subject: Perl vs shell scripts


I'd like to know whether Perl programming is better than shell scripts
(speed ? efficiency ? easyness ?)
And where I could get the package. .. Freeware ?
---------------------
Alain Menezes   
ASLK-CGER Services GIE                          Tel.:  +32 2 228.55.74
Rue Fossé-aux-Loups, 48                               Fax.:  +32 2 228.83.69
1000  Bruxelles                                         Email:
a.menezes AT aslk-cger DOT be

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>