nv-l

Re: Having problems getting simple pass on match ruleset functioning.

1999-02-16 09:22:43
Subject: Re: Having problems getting simple pass on match ruleset functioning.
From: James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:22:43 -0500
I am puzzled by what you are trying to do.  You have a pass-on-match (not a
reset-on-match) so if no match occurs, nothing happens.  So no action
occurs unless you get the Node_Down and the Node_Up within the time frame
(300 seconds or 5 minutes).    There is no default action with a pass.

James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support



Mark van Kerkwyk <kerkwyk AT COMTECH.COM DOT AU> on 02/15/99 06:35:29 PM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks)
Subject:  Having problems getting simple pass on match ruleset functioning.







Hi ,
     does anyone know of any wierd problems relating to the pass on match
ruleset function under Solaris (I have found a few Solaris only glitches
now).

I am trying to implement a similar solution to which Joe sent me last week
for creating a Node_Down threshold, I can get the pass on match to work
when there is a Node_Up and Node_Down within a time frame (ie 10mins), but
I cannot get it to work when there isn't a Node_Up event within 10mins
after the Node_Down event.

Am I trying to implement this the wrong way, must there be a second event
for this function to work ??

Attached is test.rs which is a very simple test I cannot get to work.

Maybe I am going about this the wrong way ??

Mark


(See attached file: test.rs)

Attachment: test.rs
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Having problems getting simple pass on match ruleset functioning., James_Shanks <=