nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Unofficial IP addresses

1999-02-15 16:33:14
Subject: Re: Unofficial IP addresses
From: Mark van Kerkwyk <kerkwyk AT COMTECH.COM DOT AU>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 07:33:14 +1000 
Unfortunately Netview's SNMP implementation doesn't support NAT.

That's my number 1 wish list item for Netview.

Mark





Ken Karasek <KGKARASE AT HEWITT DOT COM> on 16/02/99 06:15:41

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu>



 To:      NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu

 cc:



 Subject: Re: Unofficial IP addresses







Have you thought about implementing NAT to resolve your multiple 10.x.x.x
networks?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Unofficial IP addresses, Ken Karasek
Next by Date:  Re: passing parameters in rulesets, erik nilsson
Previous by Thread:  Re: Unofficial IP addresses, Ken Karasek
Next by Thread:  Forcing a config poll, Lucy Premus
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]