nv-l

Re: Utilization on Serial interfaces vs. Ethernet/TokenRing

1998-10-09 21:07:43
Subject: Re: Utilization on Serial interfaces vs. Ethernet/TokenRing
From: Walter Hjelmar <walter AT TKG DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 21:07:43 -0400
Is there a searchbot that listens to this list for a message that contain
the word historical and automatic responds with a message saying check out
www.tavve.com?

There seems to be at least one message a week...

                        -Walter-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et
> alia [mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU]On Behalf Of Tim Clark
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 1998 8:34 AM
> To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Utilization on Serial interfaces vs. Ethernet/TokenRing
>
>
> Please visit www.tavve.com for historical utilization, stat's,
> and trending
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giuliotti, J. P. <JGiuliotti AT MFS DOT COM>
> To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
> Date: Thursday, October 08, 1998 6:03 PM
> Subject: Utilization on Serial interfaces vs. Ethernet/TokenRing
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I know I have seen this discussed before so can someone clarify the
> >difference in utilization % on serial links vs. other network mediums? I
> >think transmission in simplex vs. duplex has something to do
> with it. Also
> >can someone give me the correct way to set up mib polling for bandwidth
> >utilization on serial links?
> >
> >For other links, I use the inOct+outOct *8 /100 *ifSpeed  formula.
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >J.P. Giuliotti
> >
>