Re: Interface Addr Change & Config Checks.

1998-09-01 11:43:46
Subject: Re: Interface Addr Change & Config Checks.
From: "Prokott, Joe" <Joe.Prokott AT WESTGROUP DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 10:43:46 -0500

I agree that I would think this should be done also.  I also want to ask why
wouldn't/shouldn't this occur on NetView for UNIX, as well as the NetView
for NT version?  Thanks,

Joe Prokott - West Group
Network Architect
610 Opperman Drive
St. Paul, MN  55123
Phone: 651-687-4536
Fax: 651-687-6946
E-mail: joe.prokott AT westgroup DOT com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boyles, Gary P [SMTP:gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 10:04 AM
> Subject:      Interface Addr Change & Config Checks.
> This is a NetView NT question...
> When I change the address of an interface on a router, I can understand
> that the old icon turns red... because NetView doesn't know whether
> the address has been changed, or the interface is down.
> But... once NetView does a configuration check for the router, shouldn't
> it
> get rid of the old interface icon, and bring on a new one for the new
> address.
> Shouldn't it do the delete on the old interface icon even if that
> interface
> has been set to unmanaged?
> Obviously, the reason I'm asking is.. that this doesn't always appear
> to be the case.
> Regards,
> Gary Boyles, Intel