I posted my only document on ruleset performance on 07/31/98. If you
haven't got a copy, you could retrieve it by sending this to
listserv AT ucsbvm.ucsb DOT edu :
search nv-l rulesets from 1998/07/30
and follow the instructions you get back. They will tell you how to send
the listserv a note asking for this document. Note that you are sending to
listserv and not to NV-L. listserv is the list agent; NV-L is the list.
These are performance guidelines based on experience. That is why you do
not see them in the product doc. If anyone has discovered more, feel free
to post yours too.
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
Jose Luis Arbona Orovay <jarbo AT INFOCENTRE.GVA DOT ES> on 08/07/98 09:07:42 AM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView et alia <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc: (bcc: James Shanks)
Subject: Re: Rulesets
James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM escribis:
> nvcorrd does not expect to have any in-line actions which involve
> that themselves spawn new shells or child processes. But if you think
> have discovered a bug and you want it fixed, then you will have to open a
> call to Support and report it. Be prepared to trace the execution of
> failing ruleset and to ftp that along with the ruleset to the Level 2
> for analysis. If they can see the bug in what you send or reproduce it
> themselves, then they will open an APAR to get it fixed. They will be
> happy to explain how to gather the data they need.
I have modified my ruleset, removing all Inline Actions, which executed the
event command, and putting Actions instead, and it has worked very well,
defuncts don't have appeared. But, I have been reading the NetView
Administrator's Guide and dont have found anything about a restriction in
Inline Actions with spawning processes, where can I find more information
that kind of tips? are there more like this?
Thanks a lot.