nv-l

Re: Interfaces

1998-06-11 10:33:41
Subject: Re: Interfaces
From: Maciej Podoski <Maciej.Podoski AT THEMUTUALGROUP DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:33:41 -0400
I've looked at it only from the network reachability point of view, I didn't 
think that NetView itself is so strongly tied to the token ring interface.  The 
hostname did not change after all, just the interface, and NetView used all 
three interfaces
before ( ethernet, tkr and ATM ).  I've never even heard of reset_ci.  Is it 
documented anywhere?  What does it do?

Maciej





NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu on 06/11/98 11:12:04 AM
Please respond to NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu @ Internet


To:     NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu @ Internet
cc:

Subject:        Re: Interfaces

Maciej -

Think about what you are doing.  NetView knows his own interface and
hostname -- it's in his database.  Now you have yanked it out from
underneath him.  You need to run reset_ci at least.

James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support


Maciej.Podoski AT THEMUTUALGROUP DOT COM on 06/11/98 09:23:47 AM

Please respond to NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks)
Subject:  Interfaces





Hi there

I have an AIX 4.1.5 RS/6000 with NetView 4.1.2.  The box has ethernet,
token ring and ATM interfaces, but at the moment the bulk of traffic goes
through the token ring interface.  I want to move all that traffic to the
ATM interface and all seemed fine untill I tried to reboot the machine.
First of all, it took forever as the SNMP agent timed out, then the GUI
would not start and so on.  My question is then is there something in the
standard NetView startup files that looks for a token ring interface?  Or
should a change to the default gateway and to the static routes in the
routing tables be enough?

Maciej


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>