We have not seen any new 50 errors but I will update if we do encounter them. 

Daniel Jimenez
Backup and Recovery

-----Original Message-----
From: ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com [mailto:ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com] 
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:38 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; 
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 72, Issue 15

What about those "phantom error 50's"? Does 7.1.0.4  address those?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: "Jimenez, Daniel" <Daniel.Jimenez AT owb DOT com>
Sender: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:35:11 
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn 
DOT edu>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 72, Issue 15

Hey guys

An update on the 7.1.0.4 upgrade. We upgraded our environment to 7.1.0.4 over 
the past two weeks and noticed several fixes for 196 errors and VCB issues, as 
well as quick erase speeds increasing and less issues with policy corruption. 
So I would suggest going to this version if you are on 7.1.0.1 or 7.1.0.3. 

Daniel Jimenez
Backup and Recovery


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of 
veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 10:00 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 72, Issue 15

Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
        veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        veritas-bu-owner AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Netbackup 7.5 Operational Restore or Search & Hold        ??????
      (Anurag Sharma)
   2. Re: Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4 (Anurag Sharma)
   3. Re: Netbackup 7.5 Operational Restore or Search & Hold    ??????
      (smpt)
   4.  Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4 (tsimerson)
   5. Re: Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4 (Neil Conner)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:13:00 +0530
From: Anurag Sharma <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.5 Operational Restore or Search &
        Hold    ??????
To: veritas-bu <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID: <SNT131-W770DDBE859E1AD14D34BCEB3C0 AT phx DOT gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"



    
      
All

I?ve been doing deep dive in NetBackup 7.5 and the benefits involved.
One of the greatest enhancements with this release is Opscenter and the role it 
is going to play in the future restores
 
Netbackup Opscenter 7.5 comes for free and the comes with the FREE feature of 
?operational restore?
Operational restore allows searching files acorss multiple Netbackup 
domains (master servers) and does not need any special licensing and\or 
hardware.
 
I also read in great depth about Netbackup 7.5 ?Search and Hold? This
 can also search files across the multiple NetBackup domain (master 
servers). However this has following requirements
Search and Hold License to activate the same in opscenter Separate Index server 
(new role with Netabckup 7.5)
 
My question is why should an organization consider investing in 
search and hold license and buying expensive hardware for the index 
server when the same can be furnished by the operational restore feature
 ?????
    
                                          
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20120419/9db8743f/attachment-0001.htm
 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:21:42 +0530
From: Anurag Sharma <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4
To: <nbuser AT live DOT com>, <daniel.jimenez AT owb DOT com>
Cc: veritas-bu <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID: <SNT131-W22CC06CA20BB2B459B1E4AEB3C0 AT phx DOT gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Daniel,

Go for 7.1.0.4 if you are using symantec deduplication... else not off use.

7.1.0.4 is the last release after that only option is netbackup 7.5

Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:22:50 -0700
From: nbuser AT live DOT com
To: Daniel.Jimenez AT owb DOT com
CC: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4

We just upgraded from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0.3 and so far no issues.
Sent from my TAB. Please excuse spelling errors.
On Apr 6, 2012 10:45 PM, "Jimenez, Daniel" <Daniel.Jimenez AT owb DOT com> 
wrote:

Hey guys Anyone upgrade to 7.1.0.4? And those that did upgrade, can you tell me 
if the version seems stable or were there issues encountered after the upgrade? 
 Daniel Jimenez
Backup and Recovery
 
_______________________________________________

Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu




_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu                       
                  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20120419/cf6fa716/attachment-0001.htm
 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:13:04 +0300
From: "smpt" <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.5 Operational Restore or Search
        &       Hold    ??????
To: "'Anurag Sharma'" <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>,       "'veritas-bu'"
        <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID: <000001cd1e0c$a0f2cd00$e2d86700$@gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello,

Let's say that you are a  backup admin working for a big company.

One day they found that someone inside your company was spying for benefit
of a competitor.

Your supervisor came to you and say: "Please find all files of the user x
and keep them infinity or at least up to the end of the court  as we will
sue  him."

 

I can only imagine what work the admin has to do in order to fitful this
request. And he has to keep track all changes in order to revert them.

With search and hold, symantc says, that this task is a please of cake. And
when you "un-hold", the images return to the original retention.

 

If you are in "per terabyte" license model, then it is free.

 

PS. I have not play with this option. I will when I will have time.

 

stefanos

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Anurag
Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:43 PM
To: veritas-bu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.5 Operational Restore or Search & Hold
??????

 



All



I've been doing deep dive in NetBackup 7.5 and the benefits involved.
One of the greatest enhancements with this release is Opscenter and the role
it is going to play in the future restores
 
Netbackup Opscenter 7.5 comes for free and the comes with the FREE feature
of "operational restore"
Operational restore allows searching files acorss multiple Netbackup domains
(master servers) and does not need any special licensing and\or hardware.
 
I also read in great depth about Netbackup 7.5 "Search and Hold" This can
also search files across the multiple NetBackup domain (master servers).
However this has following requirements

1.      Search and Hold License to activate the same in opscenter
2.       Separate Index server (new role with Netabckup 7.5)

 
My question is why should an organization consider investing in search and
hold license and buying expensive hardware for the index server when the
same can be furnished by the operational restore feature ?????

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20120419/7f746436/attachment-0001.htm
 

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:23:20 -0700
From: tsimerson <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu]  Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4
To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Message-ID: <1334838200.m2f.371935 AT www.backupcentral DOT com>

NBU 7.1.0.4 is probably the most stable of the 7.1 patches.  I have had several 
customers that were/are on earlier releases which required several EEB fixes to 
be applied.  If you are doing any kind of deduplication (MSDP or OST 
appliances) or using SLPs, then you will want to be on 7.1.0.4.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by tom AT tjsimerson DOT org via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:35:47 -0700
From: Neil Conner <neil AT mbari DOT org>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <4E372588-E0CF-40AE-869D-16CF69DABC79 AT mbari DOT org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I agree. I upgraded from 7.1.0.2 to 7.1.0.4 a few weeks ago and I haven't run 
into any issues. This release contains a LOT of bug fixes (add VMware to the 
list below).


On Apr 19, 2012, at 5:23 AM, tsimerson wrote:

> NBU 7.1.0.4 is probably the most stable of the 7.1 patches.  I have had 
> several customers that were/are on earlier releases which required several 
> EEB fixes to be applied.  If you are doing any kind of deduplication (MSDP or 
> OST appliances) or using SLPs, then you will want to be on 7.1.0.4.
> 
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by tom AT tjsimerson DOT org via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 72, Issue 15
******************************************


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu