Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fw: Data Domain Question

2011-08-16 14:34:12
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Fw: Data Domain Question
From: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>
To: <ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com>, <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:34:05 -0500
We have a retention period of 2 weeks on our SQL2008 environment which is 
dumping directly to our DD670.  A quick check of our current stats show we are 
getting 34.02x compression on the contents of this directory.  In theory 
compression will get better the longer you keep the data.  We don't have a need 
for more than 2 weeks worth so that's all we keep.

I can probably get some more specifics regarding the amount of data being 
backed up etc.. if that would help any further.

Mark Glazerman
Desk: 314-889-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
 please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of 
ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:03 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fw: Data Domain Question


------Original Message------
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Data Domain Question
Sent: Aug 16, 2011 1:59 PM

To all,

I am interested in finding out what deduplication ratios users are seeing when 
backing native SQL dumps to a Data Domain array? 

Having friends who work for EMC, they say 3:1 to 4:1, but I am looking for real 
numbers that users are seeing not the sales numbers.

Please let me know

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>