Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?
2011-05-12 09:14:57
FYI-It is a bit dated but may provide some
insight.
How to force backups over multiple
networks due to which the use of REQUIRED_INTERFACE can not be used
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH37209
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Lightner, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 7:55
AM
To: Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com; VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Cc: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU;
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?
I’m with Rusty on this. We
have been using a separate backup LAN for a few years now and have never used
REQUIRED_INTERFACE. We simply set a backup host name (e.g. if
primary is myhost then backup is myhostb) and add that to /etc/hosts on master
and add the backup LAN IP for the master to hosts on the individual servers.
In the recent issues we had with host name
resolution one of the first recommendations we got was for using
REQUIRED_INTERFACE but I resisted that mainly because I wasn’t sure what that
would do to the separate interface we use to connect to our Dedupe
appliances. As seen in that thread (bpclntcmd on hp-ux) the
resolution had nothing to do with use of REQUIRED_INTERFACE. If
you’re being pushed to do this by support you might want to push back.
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 9:02
PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Cc: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU;
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
REQUIRED_INTERFACE,anyone using private backup networks?
I've never liked REQUIRED_INTERFACE
as it seems to be problematic. Perhaps it's just me. Most of our NBU servers
have at least 3 networks (backup network, mgmt network and metadata/intra-nbu
network). We use multiple host file entries with the different interface names
and corresponding entries on the client. We also have to put the proper SERVER
entries in place. It's probably more complicated but as long as these entries
don't get messed with, all works perfectly. My point is perhaps this type of
solution could work for you.
Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr.
Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪
281-584-4693
Keeping
People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/
P Think before you print
CONFIDENTIALITY:
This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary
and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is
prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
deasnutz
<nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Sent
by: <veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
05/11/2011
06:53 PM
Please respond
to
<VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU>
|
|
To
|
<VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE,
anyone using private backup networks?
|
|
Anybody
have working experience on the "require_network" or
"required_interface" functionality?
Our clients/media servers have a private network to
traverse. Master is not connected (different site) however...v7.1.
Thanks!
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by kevin.corley AT apollogrp DOT edu via
Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist -
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Please consider our
environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------
|
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, deasnutz
- Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, Rusty.Major
- Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, veritas netbackup
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, deasnutz
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, rhugga
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, rhugga
|
|
|