Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?
2011-05-12 09:00:31
I agree, using REQUIRED_INTERFACE is tricky and does not meet the needs in often cases.
If NB 7.1, a new configuration - PREFERRED_NETWORK is introduced. It is very flexible (and hence, powerful) mechanism to instruct NetBackup how you want it to use host's network interfaces. 7.1 Admin Guide has couple of pages describing it.
Hope it helps,/Girish --- On Thu, 5/12/11, Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com <Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com> wrote: From: Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com <Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks? To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU Cc: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU,
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu Date: Thursday, May 12, 2011, 6:32 AM
I've never liked REQUIRED_INTERFACE as
it seems to be problematic. Perhaps it's just me. Most of our NBU servers
have at least 3 networks (backup network, mgmt network and metadata/intra-nbu
network). We use multiple host file entries with the different interface
names and corresponding entries on the client. We also have to put the
proper SERVER entries in place. It's probably more complicated but as long
as these entries don't get messed with, all works perfectly. My point is
perhaps this type of solution could work for you.
Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪
Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge
Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693
Keeping People and Information Connected®
▪ http://availability.sungard.com/
P
Think before you print
CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including
any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information,
and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from
your system.
deasnutz <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Sent by: <veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
05/11/2011 06:53 PM
Please respond to
<VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU> |
|
To
| <VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE,
anyone using private backup networks? |
|
Anybody have working experience on the "require_network"
or "required_interface" functionality?
Our clients/media servers have a private network to traverse. Master is
not connected (different site) however...v7.1.
Thanks!
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by kevin.corley AT apollogrp DOT edu via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, deasnutz
- Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, Rusty.Major
- Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, veritas netbackup
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, deasnutz
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, rhugga
- [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?, rhugga
|
|
|