On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Lightner, Jeff wrote:

> There appear to be differences in where fully qualified domain names
> need to be used.
>
> We have moved most of our environment to 7.1 but do have a few
> outstanding issues:
>
> Can't backup SQL 2000 on MS 2000 (not supported - we put the NBU 6.5.4
> client on this server since there isn't a 7.1 version.   Someone on this
> list says they got it working with 7.0.1 master and 6.5.3 client.).
>
> MS-Exchange 2010 GRT restores don't seem to work.   We have a case open
> for this and have been providing info.   This morning we're hearing this
> may be a known issue with migrating mailboxes from Exchange 2003 to 2010
> and there may be an engineering binary available.   No confirmation yet.
>
> Issue with bpclntcmd not resolving correct client names from HP-UX media
> server.   (See forum for my posts on that topic.)
>
> Also we're running a RHEL6 (Linux) master and I'm seeing system lockups
> whenever we try to push extremely large items there.   I first saw this
> when setting up vaulting which duplicates Data Domain to Quantum i6000
> tape robot.   Earlier in the week saw it again when I tried to push
> large Exchange (old Exchange 2003) backup to Data Domain.   Both of
> these issues were mitigated by using the HP-UX media server for vaulting
> and to do the backup.   (However the backup is the one affected by the
> bpclntcmd issue above.)

The entire system locked up or just NetBackup?  Does a cycle fix it?
This is very scary and makes me wonder if 7.1 is ready for heavy production
loads?

Justin.

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu