Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5

With this little bit of information it sounds like you might have a configuration mismatch with what nbu thinks the drive path is and what it really is on the OS. Check the OS's path for that drive and compare that to what nbu has. If that's not it, you may have some hardware issue with the drive.

Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693
Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/
P Think before you print
CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.

nizar motasim <nizar17_m AT hotmail DOT com>
Sent by: <veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>

04/04/2011 03:43 AM

To	<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
cc
Subject	Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5

Dear ALL ,

I need help on the below error :

4/3/2011 4:45:53 PM - requesting resource ktm-backup1-hcart-robot-tld-0
4/3/2011 4:45:53 PM - requesting resource ktm-backup1.NBU_CLIENT.MAXJOBS.ktm-mail
4/3/2011 4:45:53 PM - requesting resource ktm-backup1.NBU_POLICY.MAXJOBS.Exch
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - granted resource ktm-backup1.NBU_CLIENT.MAXJOBS.ktm-mail
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - granted resource ktm-backup1.NBU_POLICY.MAXJOBS.Exch
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - granted resource H213L4
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - granted resource HP.ULTRIUM4-SCSI.001
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - granted resource ktm-backup1-hcart-robot-tld-0
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - estimated 0 kbytes needed
4/3/2011 4:45:54 PM - started process bpbrm (5556)
4/3/2011 4:45:55 PM - connecting
4/3/2011 4:45:56 PM - connected; connect time: 00:00:01
4/3/2011 4:49:37 PM - mounting H213L4
4/3/2011 4:50:11 PM - mounted; mount time: 00:00:34
4/3/2011 4:50:16 PM - positioning H213L4 to file 2
4/3/2011 4:51:08 PM - positioned H213L4; position time: 00:00:52
4/3/2011 4:51:08 PM - begin writing
4/3/2011 6:17:26 PM - Error bptm(pid=816) cannot write image to media id H213L4, drive index 1, The request could not be performed because of an I/O device error.
4/3/2011 6:17:33 PM - end writing; write time: 01:26:25
media write error(84)

> From: veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5
> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:00:02 -0500
>
> Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> veritas-bu-owner AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. anyone who has experience on hyper-v backup (Asiye Yigit)
> 2. Re: anyone who has experience on hyper-v backup (smpt)
> 3. media server on hyper-v servers using same clustered shared
> volume (Asiye Yigit)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:56:08 +0300
> From: "Asiye Yigit" <asiye.yigit AT gantek DOT com>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] anyone who has experience on hyper-v backup
> To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello;
>
>
>
> Is there anyone who is expert on hyper-v backups?
>
> We are really suffering from slowness on just hyper-v backup including
> file system and virtual client.
>
> I am suspecting someting between the interaction netbackup and hyper-v
> hosts.
>
> Please tell me about your performance for hyper-v backups including
> cluster shared volume.
>
>
>
> Best regards;
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110403/61b15b7a/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:58:08 +0300
> From: "smpt" <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] anyone who has experience on hyper-v backup
> To: "'Asiye Yigit'" <asiye.yigit AT gantek DOT com>,
> <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID: <000601cbf1cc$7dd42a70$797c7f50$@gr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I Have two customers with Hyper-v and they are not complaining about the
> backup speed. But I have not check the speed myself.
>
> What I know is that there is a bug (known to Symantec support), when you try
> to backup Hyper-v clusters, using the cluster name. We use the hostnames
> instead the cluster name.
>
>
>
> stefanos
>
>
>
> From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Asiye Yigit
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 12:56 AM
> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] anyone who has experience on hyper-v backup
>
>
>
> Hello;
>
>
>
> Is there anyone who is expert on hyper-v backups?
>
> We are really suffering from slowness on just hyper-v backup including file
> system and virtual client.
>
> I am suspecting someting between the interaction netbackup and hyper-v
> hosts.
>
> Please tell me about your performance for hyper-v backups including cluster
> shared volume.
>
>
>
> Best regards;
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110403/1dad70c8/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:20:29 +0300
> From: "Asiye Yigit" <asiye.yigit AT gantek DOT com>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] media server on hyper-v servers using same
> clustered shared volume
> To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
>
> Hello All;
>
>
>
> Best practices
>
> Symantec recommends the following:
>
> ? For a more efficient backup, the NetBackup media server should be installed
>
> on the same host as the Hyper-V server. In an off-host configuration, the
>
> NetBackup media server should be installed on the same host as the alternate
>
> client.
>
> In this configuration, the backup data can be sent to storage without traveling
>
> over the network.
>
>
>
> Is it still valid for my failover hyper-v servers using just one clustered shared volume (CSV)?
>
>
>
> Regards;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110403/614803d7/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
> End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5
> *****************************************
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT eduhttp://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu