I will be out of the office starting January 28th and will return on
February 3rd.
>>> veritas-bu 01/28/11 12:25 >>>
Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
veritas-bu-owner AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with HP-UX
(Joseph Despres)
2. Re: Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with HP-UX
(Justin Piszcz)
3. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
(WALLEBROEK Bart)
4. Re: Need to Find the Media Passes (Saran Brar)
5. Re: RES: Bprestore Netbackup (Saran Brar)
6. test (Saran Brar)
7. Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server
(Thomas, Nick)
8. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
(przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm)
9. Re: Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag
server (Saran Brar)
10. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
(ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com)
11. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (Daniel Pum)
12. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (Urs Krolzig)
13. Re: Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag
server (Thomas, Nick)
14. Re: Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag
server (Saran Brar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:11:52 -0500
From: Joseph Despres <jdespres AT csc DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with
HP-UX
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<OFFD6C6320.CD25B30E-ON05257825.0061919B-05257825.0069750D AT csc DOT
com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey All.................
I'm attempting to use two Data Domain systems ...........
Use them on the following systems ::--->
Master = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4
Media = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4
They are NFS mounted on both systems....
I have setup 4 Storage Units... One from each DD units attached to each
server...
And from those Storage unit's I have created 1 Storage Groups......
When I kick off a test backup ... This is all I get in the detailed
status ::--->
Jan 27, 2011 2:08:25 PM - estimated 0 kbytes needed
Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - started process bpbrm (pid=1182)
Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - connecting
Jan 27, 2011 2:08:28 PM - connected; connect time: 0:00:00
Any idea's?
Thanks.....
Joe Despres
Backup Engineer
CSC
3521 Ribcowski Ct Raleigh, NC 27616
GIS | (o): 1.919.266.1799 | (c): 1.919.931.9674 |
jdespres AT csc DOT com | www.csc.com
https://c3.csc.com/groups/netback
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use
of
e-mail for such purpose.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/acb62d01/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:24:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Attempting to use two Data Domain systems
with HP-UX
To: Joseph Despres <jdespres AT csc DOT com>
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101271424170.8741 AT p34.internal DOT lan>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Hi,
What does the bpbrm log say?
Can you write to the data domain NFS mounts as root?
Justin.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Joseph Despres wrote:
> Hey All.................
>
> I'm attempting to use two Data Domain systems ...........
>
> Use them on the following systems ::--->
>
> Master = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4
> Media = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4
>
> They are NFS mounted on both systems....
>
> I have setup 4 Storage Units... One from each DD units attached to
each
> server...
>
> And from those Storage unit's I have created 1 Storage Groups......
>
> When I kick off a test backup ... This is all I get in the detailed
> status ::--->
>
> Jan 27, 2011 2:08:25 PM - estimated 0 kbytes needed
> Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - started process bpbrm (pid=1182)
> Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - connecting
> Jan 27, 2011 2:08:28 PM - connected; connect time: 0:00:00
>
> Any idea's?
>
> Thanks.....
>
> Joe Despres
> Backup Engineer
> CSC
>
> 3521 Ribcowski Ct Raleigh, NC 27616
> GIS | (o): 1.919.266.1799 | (c): 1.919.931.9674 |
> jdespres AT csc DOT com | www.csc.com
> https://c3.csc.com/groups/netback
>
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake
in
> delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate
to
> bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
> written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the
use of
> e-mail for such purpose.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:28:38 +0100
From: WALLEBROEK Bart <Bart.WALLEBROEK AT swift DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<457A0A8F6998FC47BA88352E340EEA91B70665034E AT BE-EXCHANGE-10.swift DOT
corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not
supported when running Solaris on X66 ?
We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC
(zones).
Best Regards,
Bart WALLEBROEK
Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist?
Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management
S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
From: "James Yaple" <James.Yaple AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at
$WORK.
The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to
Solaris on x86.
Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more
or
less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
Thanks in advance,
James
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:34:50 -0800
From: Saran Brar <saranbrar AT live DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Need to Find the Media Passes
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<AANLkTin36oeT4WXzcFegmac+fo-yLjvqRqOF3CdZY4Ey AT mail.gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
try nbemmcmd -listmedia -mediaid <mediaid>
check the no. of mounts.
hope this helps.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:57 AM, NBU
<netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>wrote:
> Hi Forum,
>
> I need to know how many time the media has been used....media passes.
>
> If anyone can help with any command/procedure to do so.
>
>
> Thanks in Advance.
>
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by qureshiumar AT rediffmail DOT com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/034ab448/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:54:07 -0800
From: Saran Brar <saranbrar AT live DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: Bprestore Netbackup
To: rodrigo.moura AT light.com DOT br
Cc: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=g8hvQq3j3Pj_79Joegb0oeiGQGp-693Sk6PDe AT mail.gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Did you hit ENTER key after putting last entry in the rename file.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:31 AM, <rodrigo.moura AT light.com DOT br> wrote:
> Riccardo,
>
> Try to -t 17 (SAP)
>
> bprestore -K -L /tmp/restore.log -C source -D destination -t 17 -s
> 10/17/2010 07:00:00 -e 10/18/2010 06:30:00 -f /tmp/list
>
> Rodrigo Passos de Moura
> Analista de Suporte
> Service IT Solutions
> 55 21 22114471
> 55 51 33146000
> RS-PR-SP-RJ-ARG
> www.service.com.br
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:
> veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] Em nome de riccardo1981
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2011 13:16
> Para: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
> Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Bprestore Netbackup
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have this problem. I trying to restore some file using bprestore CLI
> command line
>
> The sintax is the follow:
>
> bprestore -B -L c:\temp\log1.txt -C source_server -D destination
server -s
> 01/01/2008 -e 12/31/2010 -R C:\temp\pippo.txt -f C:\temp\topolino.txt
>
> where pippo.txt is:
> change /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/ to /C/temp/CRSTD_BD/
>
> and topolino.txt is:
>
> /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/UDBDAD01.XBD.CSRTFID200810.DEL
> /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/UDBDAD01.XBD.CSRTFID200908.DDL
> /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/UDBDAD01.XBD.CSRTFID200909.DEL
>
> The result is
> in the GUI : Exit Status: 227 (no entity was found)
> in dos-shell is:
> Invalid line length in line:
> EXIT STATUS 144: invalid command usage
>
> Source server is an AIX machine , destination server is a windows
machine.
> I used the upper case for the driver letter ( for windows system)
> If I try to restore only a single file ( for example XXX810.DEL ) the
> restore works fine. The problem occured when I use the -f option.
> So where is the problem ?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Riccardo
>
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by riccardo1981 AT yahoo DOT it via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/6ad83d4d/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:20:31 -0800
From: Saran Brar <saranbrar AT live DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] test
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=sfJG8-wfNYG5fLRV-B2A0TMM4+qO5N7703u-a AT mail.gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
test
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/a0e4a04f/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:30:45 +0000
From: "Thomas, Nick" <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange
2010 dag server
To: "'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'"
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<8F42C84847DCDC4DB57041EDE4FB59973142DAB7 AT ex02mx299.icbc DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Good evening all,
We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1.
Anyone else out there seeing this?
------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person
other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited.
If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient,
please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email
immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/aabe921a/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:08:09 +0100
From: przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <20110128100809.GA5878 AT host.pgf.com DOT pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?
Regards
Przemek
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not
supported when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC
(zones).
>
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist?
> Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" <James.Yaple AT yahoo DOT com>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers
at
> $WORK.
>
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going
to
> Solaris on x86.
>
> Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more
or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------------------------------------
Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza!
Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:15:26 +0530
From: Saran Brar <saranbrar AT live DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on
exchange 2010 dag server
To: "Thomas, Nick" <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
Cc: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTimiPw=Xox3LpYry6WcF_UroWTNSj53xmY93Je68 AT mail.gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host
and
registry entries for the master/media servers.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
wrote:
> Good evening all,
>
>
>
> We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
> only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
> individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to
7.0.1.
> Anyone else out there seeing this?
>
> ------------------------------
> *
> This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized
> copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
> recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in
error
> or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy
all
> copies of this email immediately.
> *
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/a54bbc0c/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:08:27 +0000
From: ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
To: przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm,veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<1887492926-1296216421-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-957969576- AT
bda529.bisx.prod DOT on.blackberry>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Vmware Off-host backup capabilities are only supported on Windows OS.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm
Sender: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:08:09
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Reply-To: przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?
Regards
Przemek
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not
supported when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC
(zones).
>
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist?
> Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" <James.Yaple AT yahoo DOT com>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers
at
> $WORK.
>
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going
to
> Solaris on x86.
>
> Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more
or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> James
>
>_______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------------------------------------
Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza!
Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:46:47 -0600
From: Daniel Pum <dpum AT DATALINK DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<93EC9BDDB6733C47885A6554EF3674763D59EB65 AT SOME.datalink DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
The big one is that there is no dedup support - for either media server
dedup or the PDDO plugin.
Appliances that use NFS or FC VTL do work.
OST plugin support from the manufacturers varies - for example, Data
Domain does not have a Solaris x86 plugin but Quantum does.
Another big one is that there is no Granular Recovery Technology support
for Active Directory, Exchange, and SharePoint.
I've never seen one document that mentions all this, so if someone has
it and can share, I think we'd all appreciate it.
-daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:08 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?
Regards
Przemek
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not
supported when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC
(zones).
>
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist?
> Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" <James.Yaple AT yahoo DOT com>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers
at
> $WORK.
>
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going
to
> Solaris on x86.
>
> Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more
or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------------------------------------
Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza!
Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:50:44 +0100
From: "Urs Krolzig" <urs.krolzig AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
To: "Daniel Pum" <dpum AT DATALINK DOT com>,
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID: <A6845CEBBB4C4848A1896703DFF9C2B6@screamer000>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2";
reply-type=original
Hello
Since PD 6.6.1 there is support for PDDO on Solaris x86_64
Check the compatibility list http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH139108
Also in the release notes you cand find this
Solaris 10 x64 OST Plug-in
Can be found here http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH137146
Urs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Pum" <dpum AT DATALINK DOT com>
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
The big one is that there is no dedup support - for either media server
dedup or the PDDO plugin.
Appliances that use NFS or FC VTL do work.
OST plugin support from the manufacturers varies - for example, Data
Domain
does not have a Solaris x86 plugin but Quantum does.
Another big one is that there is no Granular Recovery Technology support
for
Active Directory, Exchange, and SharePoint.
I've never seen one document that mentions all this, so if someone has
it
and can share, I think we'd all appreciate it.
-daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
przemolicc AT poczta DOT fm
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:08 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?
Regards
Przemek
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not
supported
> when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC
> (zones).
>
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist
> Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" <James.Yaple AT yahoo DOT com>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers
at
> $WORK.
>
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going
to
> Solaris on x86.
>
> Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more
or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------------------------------------
Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza!
Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:06:06 +0000
From: "Thomas, Nick" <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on
exchange 2010 dag server
To: 'Saran Brar' <saranbrar AT live DOT com>
Cc: "'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'"
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<8F42C84847DCDC4DB57041EDE4FB59973142DBF5 AT ex02mx299.icbc DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am getting a 26 client server hand shaking failed.
From: saranjitb5 AT gmail DOT com [mailto:saranjitb5 AT gmail DOT com] On
Behalf Of
Saran Brar
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:45 AM
To: Thomas, Nick
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange
2010 dag server
What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host
and registry entries for the master/media servers.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick
<Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com<mailto:Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>> wrote:
Good evening all,
We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1.
Anyone else out there seeing this?
________________________________
This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than
the named recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received
this in error or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender
and destroy all copies of this email immediately.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist -
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<mailto:Veritas-bu AT
mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person
other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited.
If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient,
please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email
immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/a6546ade/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:25:26 -0800
From: Saran Brar <saranbrar AT live DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on
exchange 2010 dag server
To: "Thomas, Nick" <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
Cc: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTim9N5iXLRX5=O1tP0=-Znung=iTexN+OpSDSuie AT mail.gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Below link looks closer to your issue. Try it
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH125427
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Thomas, Nick <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
wrote:
> I am getting a 26 client server hand shaking failed.
>
>
>
> *From:* saranjitb5 AT gmail DOT com [mailto:saranjitb5 AT gmail DOT com] *On
> Behalf
Of *Saran
> Brar
> *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2011 2:45 AM
> *To:* Thomas, Nick
> *Cc:* veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on
exchange
> 2010 dag server
>
>
>
> What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host
and
> registry entries for the master/media servers.
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick <Nick.Thomas AT icbc DOT com>
> wrote:
>
> Good evening all,
>
>
>
> We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
> only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
> individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to
7.0.1.
> Anyone else out there seeing this?
> ------------------------------
>
> *This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized
> copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
> recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in
error
> or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy
all
> copies of this email immediately.*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *
> This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized
> copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
> recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in
error
> or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy
all
> copies of this email immediately.
> *
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/4807f2c0/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 57, Issue 7
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
