On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:46:53AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Yeah, just to clarify, it takes ~39-50 seconds to complete a run with ~40k 
> jobs on relatively old hardware.  OK then, have to wait for Symantec to 
> add an option to pull only the type of jobs, and to do that, they'd 
> probably need to put the job list in a DB.

Does 'bpdbjobs -summary' run faster or for the same amount of time?  If
it's faster, then they must have some sort of data structure to make it
go fast already.  Or the slowdown isn't from running through all the
jobs, it's from pulling the detail.  Either way, it wouild point to what
could be a good speedup from a local filter.

-- 
Darren
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu