Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Oracle restore question

2009-11-04 15:13:51
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Oracle restore question
From: Kevin Corley <Kevin.Corley AT apollogrp DOT edu>
To: "Reynolds, Susan K." <SReynolds2 AT semprautilities DOT com>, "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:10:42 -0700

Look at increasing the “delay on multiplexed restores” on the media server and also increasing the number of channels being allocated in the rman restore script.

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Reynolds, Susan K.
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:55 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Oracle restore question

 

We have a group of DBAs running a restore and I was wondering if there was something in the way they kicked off their restore that caused the following:

 

“They initiate restore, tape is loaded, image is restored, tape is returned to slot in the library…then restore moves to the next image…goes back…loads the same tape, restores the images, tape is returned to slot in the library.”

 

Is there something on the Oracle side that needs to be specified that says, “load tape, restore ALL the relevant images on the tape (without unloading and reloading it again in a drive), then go to the next tape when the restore is completely done with the images on the first tape.”

 

This loading and unloading is adding 3-4 minutes to the restore of each image.

 

Are there any oracle experts out there who understand why this is happening (so we’ll know for the future and it will not be such a time-consuming process)?

This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>