What are people using for the fragment size on LTO4 (or I guess LTO3) with 
NBU 6.x?

I ask because the default is 1TB, i.e. more or less don't fragment.

The argument for a large fragment is that the backup doesn't have to stop 
so often as it does briefly at the end of each fragment to update the 
Master, and also the inter-fragment file markers waste space..though 
that's hardly a consideration on such large tapes now.

The argument for a small fragment was that the tape can position at full 
speed to the file marker for the appropriate fragment for a restore, 
rather than reading the tar file from the top at read speed, which for a 
large tape could be a very long time.

We used to (dating back to DLT7000) set a 2GB fragment, as back then this 
was thought a good idea in case you wanted to dd the tape to disk and read 
it without NetBackup.  UNIX file systems did not take files > 2GB.  Well I 
can't say we ever tried it and it's a silly small size now.

But what are people using - 100GB?  200GB?  Does it really make a 
difference...

William D L Brown


-----------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a 
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The 
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
-----------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu