Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Million file backup issue

2009-06-30 11:58:49
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Million file backup issue
From: Dave Markham <dave.markham AT fjserv DOT net>
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:55:29 +0100
Thanks for the info Bryan.

I have just changed the file path to \\.\F: and ran a test and i'm still 
getting 'WRN - can't lock raw device for read: \\.\F: (F:) (Win32 5: 
Access is denied. )

I take it there's not other flash ways without advanced client license.

Cheers

Bryan Bahnmiller wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
>   The Flash backup documentation is wrong, at least for 6.5. Instead 
> of using /\\.\F: I had to use \\.\F:
> It will backup the entire volume. And since your "empty" space 
> probably hasn't been overwritten with zeros, it will take time to back 
> it up. It should still compress like the rest of the volume. If you 
> had a VTL or are using de-dupe of some sort, even that "empty" space 
> would probably de-dupe quite well.
>
>   I just ran some tests. I had a 50 GB volume. I created about 9 GB of 
> small files, about a million or so. The backup speed would start at 
> about 10 MB/s and then when it hit the millions of tiny files, the 
> speed drastically dropped resulting in a final average of 1.7 MB/s. 
> However, the speed of the flashbackup of the raw volume ran 
> consistently at 11 MB/s, start to finish. So even though there was 
> only 10 GB to backup on a 50 GB volume, the 10 GB backup of files took 
> 1hr 44m, and the flashbackup of 50GB took 1hr 30m.
>
>   Ideally you would want to split off the "bad" files in their own 
> volume, so you aren't backing up that much white space. Is it possible 
> to shrink it in your environment? (With W2K it may not be possible.) 
> I'm not sure you can do a "mountpoint" inside of a filesystem on W2K. 
> I know it is possible in W2003 and above.
>
>       Bryan
>
>
>
>
>
> *Dave Markham <dave.markham AT fjserv DOT net>*
> Sent by: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>
> 06/30/2009 10:14 AM
> Please respond to
> dave.markham AT fjserv DOT net
>
>
>       
> To
>       "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT 
> mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> cc
>       
> Subject
>       Re: [Veritas-bu] Million file backup issue
>
>
>
>       
>
>
>
>
>
> To add.... The F:\  volume is 521gb with 134gb used. Does this mean the
> raw backup is 134gb or 521 as i dont want it filling tape unnecessarily.
>
> Ideally i'd like to do the mount point option and have a policy backing
> up the mount point of the problem dirs e.g F:\nic\lsnode but i dont know
> how to make a mount point from a current directory in windows.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave Markham wrote:
> > Running Netbackup 5.0Mp7 on Solaris 9 Master server.
> >
> > 10 odd network based clients some windows2000, 2003 and Solaris 8,9
> >
> > We are having trouble with one Windows 2000 server running Envision IDS
> > software which creates millions of files under a directory.
> > f:\nic\lsnode has 87gb data with 1.4million files. Luckily the 
> directory
> > is on a separate drive than the OS so there are options (hopefully).
> >
> > We currently can't get a backup as it fails with Status 14 or other 
> issues.
> >
> > I'm asking for advise from windows side as i'm a Unix/Solaris engineer.
> >
> > I'm guessing i need to do some image type backup with flash or snap but
> > i dont have the advanced client license and as i'm on v5 i dont see how
> > i can get one.
> >
> > I've currently tried following this :-
> > http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/275912.htm
> > and putting /\\.\F: in the file list for a new policy with the problem
> > client to do raw backup.
> >
> > However i get a Status1 and get the following error :-
> >
> > WRN - can't lock raw device for read: \\.\F: (F:) (Win32 5: Access is
> > denied. )
> >
> > I'm not sure why that is.
> >
> > Also i have not got any settings on the Client properties under VSP. I
> > dont have a cache file volume list or Cache File Size parameters other
> > than default. Should i be changing anything here?
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >
> >
> >  
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
> DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are 
> confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or 
> entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in 
> error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any 
> attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email 
> and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts 
> no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
> email. 

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>