Hi Neil,

Nope.  I mean TLS.  The XLS line is newer and beyond my budget.

--Kathy

On Wed, 20 May 2009, veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote:

> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:01:38 -0700
> From: "Conner, Neil" <neil AT mbari DOT org>
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Qualstar Libraries??
> To: "Tschida, Tom (STP)" <tom.tschida AT bsci DOT com>,       Veritas List
>       <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Message-ID: <C6385022.1989A%neil AT mbari DOT org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> You mean the Qualstar XLS...
>
> We?ve been using Qualstar TLS libraries since 1999 and they?re still going
> strong.  But when it came time to purchase an LTO library in 2007, we chose
> an Overland Storage NEO 8000 over the Qualstar XLS because the NEO has
> tighter media density and a traditional rack-sized footprint.  The NEO has
> been rock solid and the few times I?ve needed to call tech support, they?ve
> been good as well.
>
> Neil
>
>
> On 5/18/09 8:50 AM, "Tschida, Tom (STP)" <tom.tschida AT bsci DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> We are in the middle of a Physical Tape Library selection process.  We have
>> narrowed down our choices to the Quantum Scalar series and the STK SL3000, 
>> but
>> I came across some info on the Qualstar SLX library and it looks very
>> intriguing.
>>
>> So finally to the question.  Is anyone out there using the Qualstar SLX and
>> what are your thoughts?  Happy?  Disappointed?  How's the speed, reliability,
>> etc?
>>
>> Any info is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tom Tschida
>> Boston Scientific
>>
>>


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu