Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Not all NDMP drives being utilised

2009-05-20 06:31:12
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Not all NDMP drives being utilised
From: "Clooney, David" <david.clooney AT bankofamerica DOT com>
To: Veritas List <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:26:49 +0100

Hi All

 

We have a situation that I am struggling to resolve, even with the aid of symantec.

 

All NBU 6.5.3.1

Solaris 10 cluster Master

Solaris 10 media server

HPUX  11.00 media server

SUN VTL Plus 2 with NDMP 4 functionality

L700 with 4 stk T10k drives with encryption – mounts/dismounts via ACSLS

 

The basis of what we are trying to achieve( which is working on the most part) is by writing the primary copy to a vtl volume and then duplicating a copy to physical with the VTL (as the NDMP host) being the data mover for the duplication. This is all working fine and indeed the vtl  is moving the data during the duplication process, in turn alleviating the responsibility from the NBU media server, however the issue we have is that most of the time not all 4 backend drives are being utilised for no apparent reason. Most of the time ¾ are being used, and sometimes 2/4.

 

Each media server is presented a virtual library along with a number of vtl drives for the primary copy of a SLP.

Each media server is then configured via NDMP for the use of the T10k physical drives.

 

Not to complicate the matter with the configuration as the main issue is not utilising 4/4 backend drives. All the main suspects have been checked, i.e. max drives on the stu, max jobs per client etc etc. think this is proved as there are occasions where 4/4 do get utilised

 

The backend T10k’s are shared between the media servers, i.e. NDMP SSO , vmoprcmd extract below can see only ¾ being used. Additionally vmdareq below that

 

NDMP_Dr00-01             Yes     Yes    200594  200594  Yes       hcart3

     $hpux_server                    /dev/scsi/sequential/c2t0d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACS

    $solaris_server               /dev/scsi/sequential/c2t0d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACTIVE

 

NDMP_Dr00-02                     Yes     Yes    200589  200589  Yes       hcart3

     $hpux_server                    /dev/scsi/sequential/c3t0d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACS

    $solaris_server               /dev/scsi/sequential/c3t0d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACTIVE

 

NDMP_Dr00-03             Yes     Yes    200590  200590  Yes       hcart3

     $hpux_server                   /dev/scsi/sequential/c4t0d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACS

    $solaris_server               /dev/scsi/sequential/c4t0d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACTIVE

 

NDMP_Dr00-04             No      No                     No        hcart3

     $hpux_server                  /dev/scsi/sequential/c2t1d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACS

    $solaris_server               /dev/scsi/sequential/c2t1d0 ($vtl_node_with_ndmp4) ACS

 

NDMP_Dr00-01 - RESERVED on Wed May 20 11:18:10 2009

     $hpux_server                    UP

     $solaris_server               RESERVED UP

NDMP_Dr00-02 - RESERVED on Wed May 20 11:17:57 2009

     $hpux_server                    UP

     $solaris_server               RESERVED UP

NDMP_Dr00-03 - RESERVED on Wed May 20 11:20:27 2009

     $hpux_server                   UP

     $solaris_server               RESERVED UP

NDMP_Dr00-04 - AVAILABLE

    $hpux_server                   UP

     $solaris_server               UP

 

From my assumptions I think there is still a reserve of some sort  being held on the drive that isn’t being used, attempted to scour a “nbrb –dump” for this particular drive to no avail.

 

So if anyone has experienced anything similar or indeed can share some advice etc I would be most grateful.

 

Regards

 

David Clooney




Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.


When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client
engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.

If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch, Banc of America Securities Limited and MBNA Europe Bank Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  For all U.K. corporate disclosures, please refer to www.bankofamerica.com/ukcompanies


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>