OK, first rule…forget the documentation Symantec gives you
for this process..unfortunately it is not great. Here is what we use to
get http going for lu for either Windows or Unix. We have had no problem
with it now that we have the process down..and have been able to patch
application clusters…so not sure what other people have seen there.
Hope this helps:
OK, we usually use http. The disk share method is for
Windows only and Unix clients can’t get to the patches, which kind of
defeats the purpose in my opinion. So, we stick with http…here is
the process we use:
For unix live update server http access:
1.
Pull down patches to lu server/dir, unzip all in same
dir (no subdirs for each patch bundle)
2.
turn on http on lu server
/etc/init.d/apache
start (first copy /etc/apache/httpd-example.conf --> httpd.conf)
3.
ln -s <liveupdate dir>
/var/apache/htdocs/<liveupdate dir name> or where ever www root is, above
is default, this setting can be determined from the apach.conf file in
/etc/apache/apache.conf
4.
install nblu on any
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/install_nblu
when
prompted type in:
url="">
5.
Create lu policies per normal documentation and go
For windows live update server http access:
1.
Install IIS, need windows install cd, control panel/add
remove programs/windows components/application services/IIS (must go into
details at each level to unselect and select components you want for IIS and
www)
2.
Start www service
3.
Launch IIS manager, highlight default web site, right
click, new virtual dir.
4.
Put all patches in wwwroot\liveupdate
(c:\inetpub\wwwroot\create virtual dir in IIS for liveupdate
5.
Unzip all in same dir (no subdirs)
6.
SET LU_SERVER=http://<luserver>/liveupdate
(in installdir/symantec/liveupdate/LU_install.bat, then run it, make sure you
have 3 exe's in there with it, LUCheck, LU_Registration LUSetup, all 4 files on
NBU windows install cd)
**NOTES: keep all dir names and servernames lower case
for unix/windows
Renee Carlisle
ServerWare Coporation
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:10 PM
To: Michitsch, John
Cc: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Live Update.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Michitsch, John <JMICHITS AT gannett DOT com> wrote:
Is anyone using this to upgrade client agents. All
things I've seen/read are negative about the product. We wasted many hours
trying to get it to work on version 6.5 when it first came out. 6.5.3 is
supposed to fix some issues, I don't want to go down the LU road again without
the possibility of success! Anyone have it up and running successfully?
There are many caveats to getting this going properly and some are severe
enough that we're not able to implement it for us for some of the
clients. We had a lengthy discussion with the developers of the client
deployment packages at the last Symantec Tech Day in December so they're aware
of the restrictions.
One of the biggest gotchas for us is that it's pretty much unusable in a
cluster environment. One of its checks is to see if the client is
actually doing a backup before it tries to upgrade itself. If you have
multiple names for your hosts - and this is the case for close to 100% of the
cluster users - this check can fail and your backup and/or upgrade job will
fail.
In general, the NetBackup support for cluster clients is pretty poor.
Yeah, Symantec has hacked "support" in there but it's simply the case
of not breaking in a cluster but that's about it. LiveUpdate is just
another example of where Symantec's cluster "support" fails to solve
the problems properly.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org