Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)

2008-12-01 14:58:41
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)
From: <judy_hinchcliffe AT administaff DOT com>
To: <David_Cornely AT intuit DOT com>, <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:39:10 -0600

Not a problem for me has I have not applied any of the binaries.

 

 


From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Cornely, David
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1:16 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)

 

Anyone else seen this?

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/311581.htm

The description is a bit ambiguous so I’m trying to get clarity:

“A potential for missed backups without notification has been discovered in NetBackup Server/Enterprise Server when calendar based schedules have a configured window spanning midnight and go Active after midnight. This may result in a client backup not running during the next open window for any calendar based schedules configured in the same policy. This is independent of the scheduled backup type being configured as Full or Incremental.”

Does this refer to jobs going active after midnight or the policy itself being made active after midnight?  I think it’s referring to when queued jobs go active after midnight but wanted to be sure.

TIA,

-Dave

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>