Add this to the code before the blat command in nbmail.cmd. I like nbmail.cmd messages the best out of all the NBU message command files.
@ECHO OFF
@REM Get whole command line into x
@set x=%~2
@REM get last three characters of x into y
@set y=%x:~-3%
@REM Check if y ends in - 0 and exit
@if "%y%"=="- 0" goto :eof @if "%y%"=="- 1" goto :eof
@REM It doesn't if it gets here @REM Add this if you want to test @echo There is no -0 on the line
@REM @IF "%~4"=="" ( blat %3 -s %2 -t %1 -i NetBackup -server WARTHOG -q ) ELSE ( blat %3 -s %2 -t %1 -i NetBackup -server WARTHOG -q -attach %4 )
-- Chris Wible
Backup and Recovery Lead
-------------- Original message from veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu: --------------
> Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to > veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > veritas-bu-owner AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Send emails - Status Codes OTHER than 1 & 0 (oersted) > 2. Resources needed to tame NetBackup (oersted) > 3. NBU cross-site (oersted) > 4. Re: Send emails - Status Codes OTHER than 1 & 0 (Jorge F?bregas) > 5. Re: NBU cross-site (Mark Steel) > 6. Re: Send emails - Status Codes OTHER than 1 & 0 (Jorge F?bregas) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:30:21 -0400 > From: oersted > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Send emails - Status Codes OTHER than 1 & 0 > To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > Message-ID: <1223166621.m2f.287385 AT www.backupcentral DOT com> > > > if "%5" GTR "1" goto Failed > > in backup_exit_notify > > > Jorge Fábregas wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I just installed BLAT and configured the email notifications and everything > > works as expected: NB is sending emails for jobs exiting with a non-zero > > code. > > > > The problem is...I don't want to receive emails for 1's. Any way to modify > > this? (send emails on jobs ending in anything OTHER than 1 & 0?) > > > > Thanks! > > Jorge > > _______________________________________________ > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > |This was sent by solaris AT cablespeed DOT com via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com. > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:45:24 -0400 > From: oersted > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Resources needed to tame NetBackup > To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > Message-ID: <1223167524.m2f.287389 AT www.backupcentral DOT com> > > > It depends.... > > If it is a new environment, and you have the ability to implement via best > practices and following strict common sense guidelines, it is possible for one > person to maintain NBU, for 95% of sites out there. > > You must remember, NBU touches everything around it... > > umpteen different apps, network, SAN, OS, I/O etc.... > > my hat goes off to the people who code it up.....it is a monumental task > > NBU only works as good as your environment does...the weaker your infrastructure > is set up from top to bottom the more people it will take to maintain NBU. > > > > bart.wallebroek AT swift DOT com wrote: > > Is there a sheet (if possible an official report) available that someone > > knows of where it states that for a (Net)Backup environment of size X > > you need Y amount of people to monitor, maintain, patch, ... The backup > > application (in short all the stuff you need to do to keep the backups > > running). > > > > This is something I want to show to my management because I feel a bit > > undermanned here (just me, myself and I and a whole lot of NetBackup > > stuff around). > > > > Best Regards, > > Bart WALLEBROEK > > Swift > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > |This was sent by solaris AT cablespeed DOT com via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com. > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:00:52 -0400 > From: oersted > Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU cross-site > To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > Message-ID: <1223168452.m2f.287391 AT www.backupcentral DOT com> > > > with 5.x you could do this easily without clustering...but with 6.5 > > what is the amount of data at eaach site? > > how many clients at each site? > > what are critical apps? > > where is data stored? local? SAN? > > what does HA/DR SLA entail? > > if you HA/DR/BC the apps do you have to HA/DR the backup? > > what is pipe between sites? > > what is your business? > > > > > Mark Steel wrote: > > Hi > > > > I need to design and build a NBU config for a 'virtual datacentre' > > with two sites, both with production hosts. > > I also need to keep systems to a minimum, and I need HA/DR. > > I was thinking about cross-site clustered master/media server as the > > start. It would be Solaris platform so could run functions (such as > > the master server) in a zone for failover, and media server if > > required as separate zones. > > > > Anyone have any experience of this ? I guess its a balance between > > complexity of setup with trying to keep config to a minimum - I mean I > > could have simple local HA / cluster with remote failover an then do > > that both ways, but that might end up as 6 servers for initial config. > > > > Thanks > > Mark > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > |This was sent by solaris AT cablespeed DOT com via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com. > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:23:52 -0400 > From: Jorge F?bregas > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Send emails - Status Codes OTHER than 1 & 0 > To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > Message-ID: <200810042323.52713.jorge.fabregas AT gmail DOT com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Saturday 04 October 2008 08:30:21 pm oersted wrote: > > if "%5" GTR "1" goto Failed > > > > in backup_exit_notify > > > Thanks for pointing me to the right direction! I didn't have a "Failed" > section on the file...but I ended up putting this at the beginning: > > if %5 LEQ 1 goto: EndMain > > and it seems to work. > > Thanks! > Jorge > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:54:48 +0100 > From: Mark Steel > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU cross-site > To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > Message-ID: <7D35038F-FD53-4CA7-B333-F8E1644DF4E6 AT steelfamily DOT org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > hi > > its probably about 10 TB per site per night, 200 clients each site, > oracle is the main data source, most will be SAN based. > There are a small number (<20) apps at RPO/RTO= near zero, which are > cross site clustered, most other HA/DR is 4hrs, and backup needs to be > one of the HA apps because of the potential requirements to recover > other apps, also that apps might move from prod one site to prod at > the other site and we need to track backups. Pipe is 2 x 10GBE, > business is telecoms. > > Essentially i want these two sites to act as one site. > > regards > mark > > > On 5 Oct 2008, at 02:00, oersted wrote: > > > > > with 5.x you could do this easily without clustering...but with 6.5 > > > > what is the amount of data at eaach site? > > > > how many clients at each site? > > > > what are critical apps? > > > > where is data stored? local? SAN? > > > > what does HA/DR SLA entail? > > > > if you HA/DR/BC the apps do you have to HA/DR the backup? > > > > what is pipe between sites? > > > > what is your business? > > > > > > > > > > Mark Steel wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I need to design and build a NBU config for a 'virtual datacentre' > >> with two sites, both with production hosts. > >> I also need to keep systems to a minimum, and I need HA/DR. > >> I was thinking about cross-site clustered master/media server as the > >> start. It would be Solaris platform so could run functions (such as > >> the master server) in a zone for failover, and media server if > >> required as separate zones. > >> > >> Anyone have any experience of this ? I guess its a balance between > >> complexity of setup with trying to keep config to a minimum - I > >> mean I > >> could have simple local HA / cluster with remote failover an then do > >> that both ways, but that might end up as 6 servers for initial > >> config. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Mark > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu > >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > > > > + > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > |This was sent by solaris AT cablespeed DOT com via Backup Central. > > |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com. > > + > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:54:19 -0400 > From: Jorge F?bregas > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Send emails - Status Codes OTHER than 1 & 0 > To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > Message-ID: <200810051054.19613.jorge.fabregas AT gmail DOT com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Saturday 04 October 2008 11:23:52 pm Jorge F?bregas wrote: > > if %5 LEQ 1 goto: EndMain > > > > and it seems to work. > > > Arrrghhh it actually doesn't work. I have the backup_exit_notify > (plain-vanilla) that comes with 6.5 for Windows Master Server. I just don't > see in it where does it makes its decision to go ahead with notifications on > jobs other than non-zero. > > I tried: > > @if "%5" LEQ "1" goto EndMain > at the beginning but it doesn't work. > > I've seen examples where they actually send the email - on this same script - > based on the values for parameter #5... but this line is commented on the > script so it is not here where the actual SENDING is done.. Any help? :( > > Regards, > Jorge > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 > *****************************************
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|