Jeff
Can you confirm one thing.... once your disks are allocated
into a storage group, they cannot be seen by any other Server? Say for example,
your disks are on server1, and suddenly you start getting reliability issues, or
disks missing or not coming online correctly. If you host a powerful service on
these disks, are you able to MOVE those disks to another
Server?
I have seen it in use on a win2k3 cluster, and as
mentioned, part of the reason for obtaining the product was to have dynamic
disks - extend, shrink on the fly, ect.
A major problem occurred where the disks could not be seen
by any other server, other the Veritas software became so corrupt, we were
looking at a complete loss of Data. Could not even restore the Data back to the
volumes. Veritas support solution was "create new disk, restore from tape".
In the end, we created new disks, and restored the data
back to the volumes, but made sure the Veritas Software did not write any
special unique signature to the disks. I am not sure the client would want to
use this software again.
I had never had any exposure to the software until that
time. But if people are happy with it, thats great :-) For me I will steer
clear.
I second Ed’s
recommendation of Veritas Volume Manager (VxVM). Not just for
NetBackup but for most filesystems (including those for >terabyte
databases). The options one has for controlling things such as
buffering, block sizes etc… are important for databases. Moreover since it
allows you to grow/shrink filesystems on the fly it is a great tool for
Production environments where downtime Is hard to get. Finally since
it allows one to do software RAID in environments where hardware RAID isn’t
available it has that added benefit.
Most Sun Solaris shops
of any size use VxVM. Many HP HP-UX shops use VxVM even though HP
has its own Logical Volume Manager (LVM) but many still use LVM. On Linux
most Enterprise folks use LVM which is very much like the one on HP-UX.
AIX has one called LVM that I haven’t used.
Using Windows for very
large enterprise class environments simply isn’t an option for most folks due to
scalability issues.
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external) Sent: Tuesday, April
01, 2008 9:35 AM To: Ed
Wilts Cc:
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; Paul Keating Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5
index size
Ed
I use Robocopy alot,
but I feel that the product may have been ill-advised by someone who thought we
needed the product, when clearly we have proven this is not the
case.
Robocopy and Diskpart
:-) works like a charm!
From: Ed Wilts
[mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:22
PM To: WEAVER, Simon
(external) Cc: Paul Keating;
Dariusz.Klar AT sun DOT com; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5
index size
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:27 AM, WEAVER, Simon
(external) <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>
wrote:
Personally, I am not a fan of Veritas Volume
Manager, and I certainly cannot recommend it.
That's because you're a Windows guy and
the product certainly doesn't function on Windows like it does on Unix. If
you're a Unix guy, you'll see the limitations of Windows and its lack of a
volume manager very quickly.
My catalog is in a volume manager and yes,
we've grown it. We've bounced a lot of our storage around between
SAN frames as well as expanded volumes. On the other hand, my Windows
admins do nothing but bitch and moan when they have to do the same thing.
Linux, HP-UX, Solaris, VMS - all move data nicely around. Windows, well,
just say no.
Robocopy is not an alternative to a volume manager
:-)
.../Ed
-----Original Message----- From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]
On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:19 PM To: Dariusz.Klar AT Sun DOT COM; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu Subject:
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 index size
Build your catalog filesytem
using a Logical Volume Manager, such as Veritas Volume Manager (Storage
Foundations) on a SAN attached LUN. As your catalog grows you can grow both
the LUN and the filesystem hot, without an outage.
Or, if you have
availability of a recent Enterprise class array such as the HDS USP-V, you can
build it on a DP (Dynamic provisioned) LUN (aka thin provisioning)
The
array presents your server with a large fixed size LUN, even several
terabytes, but only occupies as much disk space as needed, initially, then
auto allocates disk as needed.
Personally, I'd just go the volume
manager route.
Paul
-- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN,
USA mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
This email (including any
attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or
information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy
this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or
disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any
attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability
if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered
or falsified. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Astrium
Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 REGISTERED
OFFICE:- Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
|
---------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail
may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have
received the message in error, and delete it. Thank
you. ----------------------------------
This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
|
|