Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tapes handling more that it supposed

2008-02-26 22:25:11
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tapes handling more that it supposed
From: "Martin Ruslan" <mit.martin AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:05:49 +0700
Thank you for the confirmation Justin.. :)

Regards,
Martin


On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com> wrote:


On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Martin Ruslan wrote:

> Dear Justin,
> sounds make sense for the hardware compression.
> but, I never set the hardware compression on the NBU. Did the compression do
> it self without any configuration triggered?
> I mean, is it running automatically for few types of files or datas?
> And this is happening not to all tapes.. only few tapes..
> some is oracle database, and some is windows flatfile.
If the drives can do it, from what I have always seen NetBackup turns it
on by default (other software that I have used may or may not)..

>
> @Simon:
> hopefully not David Copperfield who make strange thing happens on my
> backup.. :)
>
> @everyone:
> So this is normal if it's a database backup? (specially oracle).
> just trying to describe all the inputs.. :)
Yes, especially Oracle.

>
> Rgrds,
> Martin
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Martin Ruslan wrote:
>>
>>> Dear gurus,
>>> have you ever meet this condition?
>>> My LTO3 tapes handling more than 800GB (about 1.2TB) on the media's
>> report.
>>> I don't have any idea for this.. The backup not running the compression
>>> also..
>>> Is it maybe the block size or something? Need your advice..
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>
>> The tape drive does compression.  We see upwards of 3.0++ to 1 in some
>> cases.
>>
>> Justin.
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu